I just downloaded and installed reiser4progs-0.4.12 and libaal-0.4.9.
This was the first install of either of these, and I ran into the
following problem:
configured and make installed libaal-0.4.9
configure of reiser4progs ends with the following:
checking whether -falign-loops works... yes
FWIW, I have done a bonnie++ (the fast version with -f parameter)
comparison on all of the major linux filesystems, including reiser4,
reiser3, jfs, xfs, ext2, ext3, and ext3 in writeback mode. View in a
mono-spaced font for legibility. These were done on an Athlon with 1Gb
of ram, the
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 19:11, Tupshin Harper wrote:
I just downloaded and installed reiser4progs-0.4.12 and libaal-0.4.9.
This was the first install of either of these, and I ran into the
following problem:
configured and make installed libaal-0.4.9
configure of reiser4progs ends with the
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 05:11, Tupshin Harper wrote:
I just downloaded and installed reiser4progs-0.4.12 and libaal-0.4.9.
This was the first install of either of these, and I ran into the
following problem:
configured and make installed libaal-0.4.9
configure of reiser4progs ends with the
Yury Umanets wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 05:11, Tupshin Harper wrote:
I just downloaded and installed reiser4progs-0.4.12 and libaal-0.4.9.
This was the first install of either of these, and I ran into the
following problem:
configured and make installed libaal-0.4.9
configure of
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 02:22:33PM +0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
Fixed some bugs. And finally reiser4 should compile on 64bit boxes
(hm. somebody try it, as I am unable to build any 2.6 kernel for
ia64).
I built this with IA64 2.6.0-test4, it works but there were lots of
warnings (I can put up a
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 09:52, Ian Wienand wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 02:22:33PM +0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
Fixed some bugs. And finally reiser4 should compile on 64bit boxes
(hm. somebody try it, as I am unable to build any 2.6 kernel for
ia64).
I built this with IA64 2.6.0-test4, it
Hello!
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 05:46:24PM -0400, Tom Vier wrote:
anyone working on scsi wb's? there was a long thread on l-k about wb's, but
i wasn't aware what came of it.
There was a discussion about that on Kernel Summit 2003 and general opinion was that
SCSI
does not need the WB stuff at
Hello!
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 03:59:20PM +, Lorenzo Allegrucci wrote:
I have got this oops running fsstress and fsx-linux
on a 20Gb reiserfs partition. Fully reproducible.
What are the options to fsx and fsstress?
fsx-linux linux-2.5.0.tar.bz2 :)
mkdir d
fsstress -d d
Hello!
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 11:28:44PM +0200, Diego Calleja Garc?a wrote:
btw, I suppose this feature will be removed if/when reiser4 is merged?:
config REISER4_FS_SYSCALL
bool Enable reiser4 system call
No. It will be fixed.
dmesg errors:
(fs/ext3/inode.c, 2728):
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 08:03, Yury Umanets wrote:
Information: Reiser4 is going to be created on /dev/sda5.
(Yes/No): Yes
Creating reiser4 on /dev/sda5...
mkfs.reiser4(5676): unaligned access to 0x600242f2, ip=0x200f7661
mkfs.reiser4(5676): unaligned access to
One of my HDs at home is dying, bad blocks (and other nastiness)
appeared, and I can't mount it to recover whatever I might, as it
complains on a bad block (32768) on a rather unfriendly place:
Reiserfs super block in block 16 on 0x342 of format 3.6 with standard
journal
Count of blocks on the
Hi,
On Wednesday 27 August 2003 17:20, Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote:
One of my HDs at home is dying, bad blocks (and other nastiness)
appeared, and I can't mount it to recover whatever I might, as it
complains on a bad block (32768) on a rather unfriendly place:
bread: Cannot read the
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 06:28:45PM +0400, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
this is unfortunatelly the block the reiserfs keeps its system info in,
and there is no way to relocate it or just mark as bad.
Ugh. May I suggest the obvious, adding this into reiserfss new versions..
Have you tried to write
Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 08:03, Yury Umanets wrote:
Information: Reiser4 is going to be created on /dev/sda5.
(Yes/No): Yes
Creating reiser4 on /dev/sda5...
mkfs.reiser4(5676): unaligned access to 0x600242f2, ip=0x200f7661
mkfs.reiser4(5676): unaligned
Hi!
I got reiser4 working with the 64 bit kdev_t patch.
You are not allowed to use kdev_val except for hashing purposes. Also
the kdev_t should not be used outside the kernel. That's what dev_t is
for.
I've attached a patch that fixes the usage in a bunch of places.
But I would also vote to
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 10:41:03AM +0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
There was a discussion about that on Kernel Summit 2003 and general opinion was that
SCSI
does not need the WB stuff at all as it does the correct thing anyway.
i found this, but no real details. do you have a better link? or could
17 matches
Mail list logo
