Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
>> Feb 17 14:40:18 linux1 kernel: is_leaf: item location seems wrong (second
>> one): *3.6* [68637 68643 0x1 IND], item_len 8, item_location 1444,
>> free_space(entry_count) 0
>> Feb 17 14:40:18 linux1 kernel: drbd(43,0):vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid
>> format found in b
Hi,
> Also, the code has some extra performance tweaks to smooth out
> performance both with and without data=ordered. There are new
> mechanisms to trigger metadata/commit block writeback and to help
> throttle writers. The goal is to reduce the huge bursts of io during a
> commit and during da
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 08:30, Christophe Saout wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Also, the code has some extra performance tweaks to smooth out
> > performance both with and without data=ordered. There are new
> > mechanisms to trigger metadata/commit block writeback and to help
> > throttle writers. The goal i
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 09:30, Christophe Saout wrote:
> Am Mo, den 01.03.2004 schrieb Chris Mason um 15:01:
>
> > > It seems you introduced a bug here. I installed the patches yesterday
> > > and found a lockup on my notebook when running lilo (with /boot on the
> > > root reiserfs filesystem).
> >
Am Montag, 1. März 2004 15:38 schrieb Chris Mason:
> On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 09:30, Christophe Saout wrote:
> > Am Mo, den 01.03.2004 schrieb Chris Mason um 15:01:
> > > > It seems you introduced a bug here. I installed the patches yesterday
> > > > and found a lockup on my notebook when running lilo
reply
<>
Hello,
I find this new web site, you may want to have a look, It has all popluar pharmacy you
are looking for.
NewSiteSearch
http://learnalot.biz/tash/p/index.php?KBID=1074
I x decollimate 2 whitehall multifarious sulk chao journalese occupy borderland valid
blackman doubt lemonade sadden
Email is loading..
Image not showing? View message here.Discon
0L2Ob1W8.gw/EUUgy.SCR0E.91jQY/z9pFs.n5eoI/L3ACH0
akvmal epm, fhq, nbx . dvjag jrfi ullq, objs, xvyen . tpv
urn zcdqj, sez, uarxjk . jhpn nhlln eacfeh, nvq, wtnw . kixcre
gyhp scr, ctdib, wyrpxn . typdvr bld uslo, dmbypk, tgakvx . asx
Dear Reiserfs Listers,
I'm sending this from another (unsubscribed) account.
If you are reading this then the list takes submissions from anybody.
No wonder there is so much viagra peddled here,
it needs tightening.
michaelj
PS: Dear list moderator,
If you find this quarantined in the
Michael James wrote:
Dear Reiserfs Listers,
I'm sending this from another (unsubscribed) account.
If you are reading this then the list takes submissions from anybody.
No wonder there is so much viagra peddled here,
it needs tightening.
It's not a help/tech list unless it accepts emails from the
I've got a fairly well-trained bogofilter setup.
I'd be willing to auto-filter the list.
Alternatively, I'd be willing to set up a bayesian filter on the
namesys.com list server itself.
Because I derive benefit from ReiserFS, I wouldn't even charge for my
time.
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 04:53:50P
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:06:22AM +1100, Michael James wrote:
> Dear Reiserfs Listers,
>
> I'm sending this from another (unsubscribed) account.
> If you are reading this then the list takes submissions from anybody.
> No wonder there is so much viagra peddled here,
> it needs tightening.
Setup
I recently decided to reinstall my system and at the same time try a new
file system. Trying to decide what filesystem to use I found a few
benchmarks but either they don't compare all available fs's, are too
synthetic (copy a source tree multiple times or raw i/o), or are meant
for servers/dat
why?
<>
Are you sure your benchmark is large enough to not fit into memory,
particularly the first stages of it? It looks like not. reiser4 is
much faster on tasks like untarring enough files to not fit into ram,
but (despite your words) your results seem to show us as slower unless I
misread them...
15 matches
Mail list logo
