Hans Reiser wrote:
> Network appliance (.snapshot) and clearcase have
> demonstrated that
> having a few keywords reserved in the namespace is
> not a problem.
Sure, and having a separate attribute namespace is not
a problem, and treating files and directories as
separate entities is not a prob
Hans Reiser wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 15:41, Mike Fedyk wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 22:56, Mike Fedyk wrote:
And after having the difference of a block level journal (ext3),
instead of a "virtual" journal(reiserfs, jfs, xfs) explained to me
Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
Le Fri, Mar 26, 2004, Ã 09:11:00AM -0800, Hans Reiser a écrit:
Nikita, would you confirm that the default fibration is to sort all
files with '.' as the penultimate character by their last character
first and then by the rest of the name in the usual lexicographic or
Network appliance (.snapshot) and clearcase have demonstrated that
having a few keywords reserved in the namespace is not a problem.
--
Hans
Filipe Almeida wrote:
Hi,
There is a security problem with the implementation of dir/metas/readdir.
This file is readable even if the directory isn't readable by the current
user.
Well, this is silly and will be fixed.
This is against traditional unix behavior and is a security issue in
many
Ramy M. Hassan wrote:
I am currently using xfs on a very busy NFS server where stability, and
performance are the main concerns. I started to benchmark reiser3 and
found it outperforming xfs when I tune the file size to the average file
size in my system ( my system deals with too many writes of r
Rudy L. Zijlstra wrote:
Greetings,
I am considering buying some 250G SATA drives (3 in a RAID5 config)
for multimedia backend storage.
disks will likely be WD SATA WD2500JD unless somebody points out good
reasons not to. Can get those for about 200 Euro excluding VAT each.
This is going to be u
I've run through another test on STP with the latest snapshot against
reiser4 and reiserfs for comparison. Reiser4 still seems to be lagging
behind reiserfs in our DBT-2 workload (the bigger number is better in
the metric):
metric url to test results
-- -
Hdw: IBM netfinity 5500 PII (2 X 300MHZ) with servraid2 rev 6.10.2.4.
Kernel 2.2.22-1.2174ntplsmp
Reiserfs 3.6
SB in block16
Checking tree, error, cannot find /dev/vg01/lv01 (/root)
Neil Brosnan,
Unix Systems Administrator,
Mid-Range Systems,
Symcor Inc (RSP), (905) 273-1057
Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 15:41, Mike Fedyk wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 22:56, Mike Fedyk wrote:
And after having the difference of a block level journal (ext3), instead
of a "virtual" journal(reiserfs, jfs, xfs) explained to me (check the
ext3-
Jonathan Briggs wrote:
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 04:32, Nikita Danilov wrote:
Jonathan Briggs writes:
> The system is running Linux kernel 2.6.5-rc2. It's tainted by Nvidia
> drivers.
>
> The system was compiling the kernel, and Reiser4 panicked.
Was compilation multi-threaded (make -j)?
No
Jason Holt wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Hans Reiser wrote:
I liked Jason's script. Maybe we should consider putting it in
reiserfsprogs. Haven't yet looked at Tom's tool.
You might have misunderstood the script. It doesn't do secure delete. It
just demonstrates how shred is ineffe
On Monday 29 March 2004 14:36, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
>
> My personal take on this still is that ..metas/ makes more sense,
> like the extra dot signifying "I am really hidden" ;)
I also suggest "..meta" as best choice. This way one can avoid the (remote
but possible) case of having an appli
13 matches
Mail list logo
