Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I just modified the Reiser4 license to be the following:
The License: The Anti-plagiarism license is the Gnu Public License
Version 2 with the following modification: you may not modify,
remove, or obscure any credits in the
Humberto, I thought about it a bit more, and probably you are right in
your analysis of what makes things derived or not derived, and what the
legal consequence of that is.
Hans
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 12:34:46PM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Please consider my distinction between a credit (public television in
> the USA has them), and an ad (for profit broadcast television has them).
Both are ads. One just makes a poor attempt at failing to mention an
actual product maki
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 11:41:02AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> I don't think my clarifications of what is a derivative work conflicted
> with the GPL, they merely make it less vague as to what is a derivative
"clearifications" are modifications to the license and thereof
not relevant and incompa
Jeremy Hankins wrote:
A couple comments (that I may not be remembering properly) seemed to
imply that these credits are part of a revenue generating model. Folks
who wish to require users to see their name in conjunction with ReiserFS
may purchase this control over what ReiserFS users see (i.e., t
Another example:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/reiser4progs-0.5.3> /sbin/mkreiserfs -V
mkreiserfs 3.6.9 (2003 www.namesys.com)
A pair of credits:
Edward Shushkin wrote the encryption and compression file plugins, and
the V3
journal relocation code.
Vladimir Demidov wrote the parser for sys_reiser4(), the
@ 06/05/2004 15:29 : wrote Hans Reiser :
I just modified the Reiser4 license to be the following:
The Anti-Plagiarism License
etc.
Mr. Heiser,
I am a software developer, a paralegal, and a Debian user. Recently,
I've participated in various technical discussions in debian-devel and
in various
Vitaly, change the paragraph Nikita complained of to:
Continuing core development of ReiserFS is mostly paid for by Hans
Reiser from
money made selling licenses in addition to the GPL to companies who
don't want
it known that they use ReiserFS as a foundation for their proprietary
product. W
@ 06/05/2004 15:29 : wrote Hans Reiser :
I just modified the Reiser4 license to be the following:
The Anti-Plagiarism License
etc.
Mr. Heiser,
I am a software developer, a paralegal, and a Debian user. Recently,
I've participated in various technical discussions in debian-devel and
in various
A typical example:
/sbin/mkreiserfs -V
mkreiserfs 3.6.9 (2003 www.namesys.com)
A pair of credits:
Alexander Zarochentcev (zam) wrote the high low priority locking code,
online
resizer for V3 and V4, online repacker for V4, block allocation code,
and major
parts of the flush code, and maintain
Hans Reiser writes:
> MJ Ray wrote:
>
> > On 2004-05-04 18:47:02 +0100 Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Our licenses are free and not plagiarizable. GPL V2 is plagiarizable
> >> in the view of folks at debian who felt free to remove the credits.
> >
> >
> > Can someone gi
Matthew Garrett wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote:
The License: The Anti-plagiarism license is the Gnu Public License Version 2
with the following modification: you may not modify, remove, or obscure any
credits in the software unless your modification causes those credits to
remain
equally prominent an
Joe Wreschnig wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 12:54, Hans Reiser wrote:
When you go to the opera, they don't come on stage and say buy XYZ, but
they do say something prominent on the brochure like "we thank the
generous ABC corporation for making this evening happen". Debian should
follow that
MJ Ray wrote:
On 2004-05-04 18:47:02 +0100 Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Our licenses are free and not plagiarizable. GPL V2 is plagiarizable
in the view of folks at debian who felt free to remove the credits.
Can someone give a conclusive statement of what actually happened? The
bug r
Hans Reiser wrote:
>The License: The Anti-plagiarism license is the Gnu Public License Version 2
>with the following modification: you may not modify, remove, or obscure any
>credits in the software unless your modification causes those credits to
>remain
>equally prominent and to retain their wor
I don't think my clarifications of what is a derivative work conflicted
with the GPL, they merely make it less vague as to what is a derivative
work. The notion that if something is linked determines whether it is
derivative has no basis in either copyright law or the GPL. rms,
correct me if
I just modified the Reiser4 license to be the following:
The Anti-Plagiarism License
Pre-amble:
At the time of writing (2004), distros commonly remove, diminish, or obscure
the credits of original authors from many programs so as to ensure that the
user has brand awareness primarily of the distro.
17 matches
Mail list logo
