Sonny Rao wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 04:30:51PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 16:19, Sonny Rao wrote:
Hi, I'm investigating filesystem performance on sequential read
patterns of large files, and I discovered an odd pattern of block
allocation and subsequent re-allocati
embryologybergstromcontiguityoccupantasylum
evincecampioncovenspringwander
epitaphtemptresscollocationfiduciaryliterature
jc
1788
Check NOW to see the out:standing bar-gains that will
cut your monthly house pay:ments in half !!
((F:R.E,E)), and with (N-O)..((O;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 00:49:43 PDT, Hans Reiser said:
I think I have discovered the problem - unless there was a reason mongo was
issuing mount/unmount commands at the start/end of a mongo 'run' as well as
before/after _each phase_.
Probably someone wanted to sep
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 11:21:17PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 00:49:43 PDT, Hans Reiser said:
>
> > >I think I have discovered the problem - unless there was a reason mongo was
> > >issuing mount/unmount commands at the start/end of a mongo 'run' as well as
> > >before/a
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 02:55:55AM +0930, Tom Lanyon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can someone please inform me of how to stop the dreaded sendfile
> issues while using reiser4 and apache2?
>
> I just setup reiser4 on a nice new hard drive and tried to run apache2
> and ended up with many kernel panics and
On Monday 09 August 2004 21:50, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 02:21:57PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > At Sat, 7 Aug 2004 00:50:06 +0200,
> >
> > Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > > i have attached a workaround for bug #263348 in case nobody wants to
> > > fix it linux-kernel-head
Would it be possible to write a SQL-plugin for Reiser4 with all
typicall SQL CONSTRAINTs (foreignkeys, triggers ...etc)?
Thus data integrity a SQL-database despite a filesystem provides
and a (Ms)WinFS like system could be realised.
After writing some data with a SQL-client, you could retrieve
a pi
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 18:04, Sonny Rao wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 04:30:51PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 16:19, Sonny Rao wrote:
> > > Hi, I'm investigating filesystem performance on sequential read
> > > patterns of large files, and I discovered an odd pattern of bloc
Symantec AntiVirus found a virus in an attachment you
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To ensure the recipient(s) are able to use the files you sent, perform a
virus scan on your computer, clean any infected files, then resend this
attachment.
Attachment: mail.zip
Virus name:
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:15 pm, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> On Monday 26 July 2004 07:25, Horst Simon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I recently added a 200GB Seagate IDE drive to my system on a build-in
> > promise controller on an ASUS A7V, updated BIOS which supports large
> > disk drives.
> > The O/S is Unite
Hello,
Ra[t]es dropped last week ... Jump on it!
Need more of these? JustR-efin-ance your house/prop and you can get it
Use this for the site: http://holdtiff.com/prime/dWorld/
You must visit the link in 24 hrs to confirm your eligibility.
Sincerely,
Shawn Davis
Representative
Holland
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:31:17 PDT, Hans Reiser said:
> Thanks for explaining
>
> sync;sync;sync;halt
>
> I always felt I was failing to grok something.
As was the author who recommended it. It started out as:
# sync ( this one schedules the I/O)
# sync ( just a time waster typing)
# sync
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 12:16:39AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> >
> Interesting.What happens without overwrite, that is, if you write more
> files without deleting the old ones?
Below I made 24 one gigabyte files in sequence
All of them are similarly fragmented:
x44016way1:/mnt/tmp0/data # ls -l
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 08:53:31AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> Ok, the block allocator optimizations went in after 2.6.7. I'd be
> curious to see how 2.6.8-rc3 does in your tests.
I'll try it.
> This could be the metadata mixed in with the file data. In general this
> is a good
> Still there
Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 11:21:17PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 00:49:43 PDT, Hans Reiser said:
I think I have discovered the problem - unless there was a reason mongo was
issuing mount/unmount commands at the start/end of a mongo 'run' as wel
>
> Let me be more precise here. Is the time spent mounting and umounting
> included in the time for the phase?
[David Dabbs]
No. Each phase iteration is wrapped in a time call. The mounting and
unmounting happen before and after this, so there's shouldn't be any timing
impact. I'd need to
David Dabbs wrote:
Let me be more precise here. Is the time spent mounting and umounting
included in the time for the phase?
[David Dabbs]
No. Each phase iteration is wrapped in a time call. The mounting and
unmounting happen before and after this, so there's shouldn't be any timing
impac
Hi,
lately whenever I run fsck.reiser4 I get loads of errors about wrong sizes,
e.g., something like [1] "Object foo (stat40) has wrong size, should be X
bytes". fsck suggests to --fix them, which I do, and indeed another run of
fsck confirms that there are no problems. However after mounting t
Sonny Rao wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 12:16:39AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
Interesting.What happens without overwrite, that is, if you write more
files without deleting the old ones?
Below I made 24 one gigabyte files in sequence
All of them are similarly fragmented:
x44016way1:/mnt/t
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 21:48, Francesco Biscani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> lately whenever I run fsck.reiser4 I get loads of errors about wrong sizes,
> e.g., something like [1] "Object foo (stat40) has wrong size, should be X
> bytes". fsck suggests to --fix them, which I do, and indeed another run of
>
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 10:35:58AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 11:21:17PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 00:49:43 PDT, Hans Reiser said:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> I think I have discovered the problem - unless th
Hi,
> are messages about 'wrong size' or about 'wrong bytes' or both?
I'm _almost_ sure it's about "wrong bytes". I'll confirm ASAP. Are they
potentially harmful?
Oh, BTW, "debugfs -C" worked ok here.
Regards,
Francesco
22 matches
Mail list logo
