>| David Greaves wrote:
>
>Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>| David Greaves wrote:
>|
>|>
>|> David
>|> PS can I offer 'mask specification' (shortened to maskspec above)
>> instead of 'presentation mask' for the glossary.
>|>
>|>
>|> Glossary? of?
>
>terms.
>There have been occasional mails that try and clari
Sander wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote (ao):
Andrew Morton was very helpful in the merge, and gave useful advise
about our changes to the core kernel.
Very nice :-)
Can you give an eta on quota support for Reiser4?
Probably not soon, we are busy earning money and such for the next month
or two
Markus Törnqvist wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 11:50:35PM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
Of course, we still need to get to where we have been in -mm and there
have been no valid bug reports for a week before I think we can ask to
go into the official kernel.
What does this mean for the f
George Beshers wrote:
Ah, I suspect that this disagreement has more to do with:
What should go into the proof of concept implementation?
vs.
What is needed to win Linux community support?
Hans Reiser wrote:
George Beshers wrote:
include ".|..|[ac-z][b-z][a-qs-z]|...+"
A moments thought an
David Dabbs wrote:
Andrew Morton was very helpful in the merge, and gave useful advise
about our changes to the core kernel.
Now things get political. If you guys on this list want to see reiser4
get into mainline, you'll need to watch for the appropriate moments and
push for it to happen, bec
>
>Hans, the notes akpm put into the 2.6.8.1-mm2 ChangeLog include the following:
>
>If you see results that are much different from those at
>www.namesys.com/benchmarks.html, let us know.
>
>but the latest benchmarks available there are from March against 2.6.5-rc2.
>Does this mean that neither R
The honest answer is that it has been over a year since I looked at the
SELinux
stuff. It is on my to-do list to review what's there.
However, modulo that disclaimer, I believe what we are doing can
readily become
part of a larger strategy, indeed as you point out, it must to truely
promote
Hans Reiser wrote:
George
Beshers wrote:
- There is a *compiled mask* which is
designed to optimize *mask
evaluation*, i.e., the chroot like
semantics.
- The mask evaluation is done by the *mask interpreter* which is
in the kernel (reiser4 ar
George Beshers wrote:
>The honest answer is that it has been over a year since I looked at the
>SELinux stuff. It is on my to-do list to review what's there.
>
>However, modulo that disclaimer, I believe what we are doing can
>readily become part of a larger strategy, indeed as you point out, it
Hello,
I've been tasking my UP sparc64 for a few days now to build lots of
kernels for Debian. However, during the build, it must have stumbled
across some inconsistency in my reiser3 filesystem:
ReiserFS: sda2: warning: vs-8115: get_num_ver: not directory item
ReiserFS: sda2: warning: vs-8115: g
> Sounds like bad memory nevertheless. Can you try memtest86 for at least
> 24 hours?
Yes,
I put the computer running memtest86 after getting your email and it did in
fact pass all tests (after ~24hrs i aborted the test).
I have fairly recently upgraded the computer by adding a memory module wh
We only do filesystem isolation because that is our specialty,
filesystems, and it is better to do less well.
We fundamentally differ from other approaches because I don't think the
problem is in developing tools to allow people to fine grain security if
they take the time to do it, I think the
12 matches
Mail list logo
