Hello
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 01:15, Can Sar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've desperately been looking for a tool to migrate from ReiserFS to
> Reiser4 with no luck, I searched on the web for several hours but only
> found instructions to back up to another device and then mkfs on the
> old ReiserFS partit
I found out some interesting things tonight. I removed my /var and
/home snapshots, and all the corruption, with the exception of files I
had changed while /var and /home were in their corrupted state, had
disappeared!
I overwrote several files on /var that were corrupt with clean copies
from my
Mark Junker wrote:
Hi,
where are the Reiser4 sources? I just want to use Reiser4 in a separate
application and don't like the idea of extracting the sources from the
linux 2.6 patch.
Out of curiosity, why?
$ cd linux-2.6
$ patch [...]
$ cp -a fs/reiser4 ..
$ cd ..
$ rm -rf linux-2.6
Or, I think t
Hi,
I've desperately been looking for a tool to migrate from ReiserFS to
Reiser4 with no luck, I searched on the web for several hours but only
found instructions to back up to another device and then mkfs on the
old ReiserFS partition. Are these sources really right or is there such
a tool som
Alasdair,
Thanks for the tips. Do you think it's possible DM's snapshots
could've caused this corruption, or do you think the problem lies
elsewhere?
Alex
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:18:52 +, Alasdair G Kergon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 11:25:37PM -0600, Alex Adriaanse
Pallavi Dalya wrote:
hello,
as far as i know tree based file systems use
extents for managing free space. does reiser4 use a
bitmap based method or extents to keep track of used
and free blocks.
bitmap.
another issue is that when i tried storing a
small file an extent pointer was create
What is the time since the last update was released, and are there bugs
whose fixes are possessed only by Vitaly at this time?
Hans
Christian wrote:
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
>testing a release candidate before releasing.
>the amount of time needed depends on the amount of problems
>appeared, if debu
Alex Adriaanse wrote:
The weird thing is I did not see any I/O errors in my logs, and
running find on /var worked without a problem. By the way, did you
take any DM snapshots when you experienced that corruption?
No, no snapshots. Just working find on a large dataset (source tree,
about 16GB). Th
Sander Sweers schrieb:
I have been using the tarball from ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/.
Have not had any problems with this but I do not know how up to date it is.
I already found this but I just wanted to download the version *not*
consisting of just the linux kernel patches. Jus
hello,
as far as i know tree based file systems use
extents for managing free space. does reiser4 use a
bitmap based method or extents to keep track of used
and free blocks.
another issue is that when i tried storing a
small file an extent pointer was created for the file
which was also
I have been using the tarball from ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/.
Have not had any problems with this but I do not know how up to date it is.
Sander
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:16:47 +0100, Mark Junker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> where are the Reiser4 sources? I just want to use
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 04:59:53PM +0300, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> On Monday 21 February 2005 16:10, Ookhoi wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 01:44:41PM +0300, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> > > The new reiser4progs package is available on our ftp
> > > site (ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4progs/).
> >
On Monday 21 February 2005 17:35, Jindrich Makovicka wrote:
> Ookhoi wrote:
> > Fatal: Failed to open the reiser4 backup.
> > Fatal: Cannot open the FileSystem on (/dev/hda1).
> >
> > 1 fatal corruptions were detected in SuperBlock. Run with --build-sb
>
> option to fix them.
>
>
> Anyway, what
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:37:53 +0100, Andreas Steinmetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Adriaanse wrote:
> > As far as I can tell all the directories are still intact, but there
> > was a good number of files that had been corrupted. Those files
> > looked like they had some chunks removed, and so
Hi,
where are the Reiser4 sources? I just want to use Reiser4 in a separate
application and don't like the idea of extracting the sources from the
linux 2.6 patch.
Regards,
Mark
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 11:25:37PM -0600, Alex Adriaanse wrote:
> This morning was the first time my backup script took
> a snapshot since upgrading to 2.6.10-ac12 (yesterday I had taken a few
> snapshots myself for testing purposes, this seemed to work fine).
a) Activating a snapshot requires a
Ookhoi wrote:
> Fatal: Failed to open the reiser4 backup.
> Fatal: Cannot open the FileSystem on (/dev/hda1).
>
> 1 fatal corruptions were detected in SuperBlock. Run with --build-sb
option to fix them.
Anyway, what is the preferred way to convert reiser4 to this new backup
layout? I have all re
Alex Zarochentsev schrieb:
hello
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 01:23:25PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These 2 patches are no more needed for me and my sparc64 since you
released 1.0.4?
Today i compiled my 2.6.10-mm3-reiser4 kernel and it works fine. Only
have you tried reiser4?
no i coul
Vitaly Fertman schrieb:
libaal-1.0.4.tar.gz compiled fine without any patches.
but reiser4progs-1.0.4 did not (also no patches!):
do you have a mix of several installed versions in the system?
uninstall, check that nothing left and another try will probably help.
you mean of libaal?
no i do
On Monday 21 February 2005 16:10, Ookhoi wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 01:44:41PM +0300, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> > The new reiser4progs package is available on our ftp
> > site (ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4progs/).
>
> Thank you for this release. It doesn't crash anymore :-)
>
> But it does
hello
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 01:23:25PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
>
> These 2 patches are no more needed for me and my sparc64 since you
> released 1.0.4?
> Today i compiled my 2.6.10-mm3-reiser4 kernel and it works fine. Only
have you tried reiser4?
> problem left is LVM cause th
> libaal-1.0.4.tar.gz compiled fine without any patches.
> but reiser4progs-1.0.4 did not (also no patches!):
do you have a mix of several installed versions in the system?
uninstall, check that nothing left and another try will probably help.
> format40.c:255: warning: type defaults to `int' in
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 12:49:12PM +0300, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> On Friday 18 February 2005 17:08, Ookhoi wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 04:19:59PM +0300, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> > > On Friday 18 February 2005 11:31, Ookhoi wrote:
> > > > Are new reiser4progs available? I can only find 1.0.3 a
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 01:44:41PM +0300, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> The new reiser4progs package is available on our ftp
> site (ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4progs/).
Thank you for this release. It doesn't crash anymore :-)
But it does tell me:
"NO REISER4 METADATA WERE FOUND. FS RECOVERY IS
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
On Wednesday 16 February 2005 17:09, Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 02:17:49PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i just wondered about reiser4fs working on SPARC64? I use Gentoo Sparc64
and it is working fine with kernel 2.4.28. But is the Reiser4 c
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
On Wednesday 16 February 2005 17:09, Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 02:17:49PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i just wondered about reiser4fs working on SPARC64? I use Gentoo Sparc64
and it is working fine with kernel 2.4.28. But is the Reiser4 c
Alex Adriaanse wrote:
As far as I can tell all the directories are still intact, but there
was a good number of files that had been corrupted. Those files
looked like they had some chunks removed, and some had a bunch of NUL
characters (in blocks of 4096 characters). Some files even had chunks
of
Hello
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 08:25, Alex Adriaanse wrote:
> As of this morning I've experienced some very odd data corruption
> problem on my server. Let me post some background information first.
>
> For the past few years I've been running this server under Linux 2.4.x
> and Debian Woody. It h
28 matches
Mail list logo
