On Tue, March 1, 2005 3:05, Edward Sanford Sutton said:
you should not send such responses if an address is likely spoofed. in any
case, there were no included instructions for protection or detail as to
the
messages of problematic quantity and undesired content.
On Thursday 24 February 2005
http://ITCpr.ddekcalai.com/?apILcraQLKhzsaGPmPDI
Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 07:34:11PM +, Szabolcs Illes wrote:
Hi All,
I have been using reiser4fs for 4 months without any problem since
today. After tryinig to open a movie with mplayer a have this in my log:
no other reiser4 messages in the log for 4 months?
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait dernirement que :
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc5/2.6.11-rc5-mm1/
- Lots of tuning/balancing changes in the CPU scheduler. Mainly targetted
at larger SMT/SMP/NUMA machines. It's going to be hard to work out
Mathieu Segaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait dernirement que :
Hum, one hunk didn't make it.
The complete patch is attached
fs/reiser4/plugin/item/ctail.c: In function `check_ctail':
fs/reiser4/plugin/item/ctail.c:250: attention : l'adresse de ctail_ok
sera toujours value comme tant true
Mathieu Segaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait dernirement que :
Mathieu Segaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait dernirement que :
Hum, one hunk didn't make it.
The complete patch is attached
as any time I post with no sleep for 3 days, more noodles than brain
are in my skull. Did tha wrong strip level,
Mathieu Segaud wrote:
Mathieu Segaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait dernirement que :
Hum, one hunk didn't make it.
The complete patch is attached
fs/reiser4/plugin/item/ctail.c: In function `check_ctail':
fs/reiser4/plugin/item/ctail.c:250: attention : l'adresse de ctail_ok sera toujours value
Hans Reiser said...
I am frankly skeptical that one should attempt to clone windows.
Hans
Yes. It's a bit like cloning Frankenstein's monster, isn't it?
In the end all you have a bolt-compatible product that runs slowly on
lightening and falls apart if you hit it on the head too hard.
jim
Hello all,
I'm just switching from 2.4/reiser3 to 2.6/reiser4 on the first batch of
machines. We are running a bunch of apple xRAIDs connected to Dell
servers running Debian. we have the 2.6.10-mm kernel and we can make the
reiser4 partitions, but there is a lot of lost space somewhere. If I
On Tuesday 01 March 2005 19:54, fitzboy wrote:
Hello all,
I'm just switching from 2.4/reiser3 to 2.6/reiser4 on the first batch of
machines. We are running a bunch of apple xRAIDs connected to Dell
servers running Debian. we have the 2.6.10-mm kernel and we can make the
reiser4 partitions,
Clifford Beshers wrote:
progsreiserfs was the culprit. Rebuilding with reiserfsprogs has
restored sanity.
Clifford Beshers wrote:
Cool.
Fred Schaettgen wrote:
On Tuesday 01 March 2005 19:54, fitzboy wrote:
Hello all,
I'm just switching from 2.4/reiser3 to 2.6/reiser4 on the first batch of
machines. We are running a bunch of apple xRAIDs connected to Dell
servers running Debian. we have the 2.6.10-mm kernel and we can make the
Are there any plans or schedule for a reiser4.1? when will it be safe
to label reiser4 as safe for using on mission critical servers?
Thanks,
Gagan
hello
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 05:16:47PM +0100, Mark Junker wrote:
Hi,
where are the Reiser4 sources? I just want to use Reiser4 in a separate
application and don't like the idea of extracting the sources from the
linux 2.6 patch.
public access to our bk repository works again (there
14 matches
Mail list logo
