Re: Reiser4 O_DIRECT

2005-05-22 Thread Hans Reiser
What Vladimir failed to say was that it is our recent changes to accomodate the kernel maintainers that are unstable, we had previously reached the point where none of our internal tests could make it crash. I hope that he did not put these unstable changes on our website for users to see them

Re: Reiser4 O_DIRECT

2005-05-22 Thread Markus T�rnqvist
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:43:52AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: What Vladimir failed to say was that it is our recent changes to accomodate the kernel maintainers that are unstable, we had previously reached the point where none of our internal tests could make it crash. I hope that he did not put

Re: Reiser4 O_DIRECT

2005-05-22 Thread Hans Reiser
Markus Törnqvist wrote: On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:43:52AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: What Vladimir failed to say was that it is our recent changes to accomodate the kernel maintainers that are unstable, we had previously reached the point where none of our internal tests could make it crash.

Re: Reiser4 O_DIRECT

2005-05-22 Thread Martin Piayda
On So, 2005-05-22 at 20:12 +0300, Markus TXrnqvist wrote: On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:43:52AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: What Vladimir failed to say was that it is our recent changes to accomodate the kernel maintainers that are unstable, we had previously reached the point where none of our

Courtney Anderson

2005-05-22 Thread Latasha Ames
4bC855 Edmond Gay - http://pycnanthemumyogurts.net 2Bw335

Re: Re[2]: Reiser4 O_DIRECT

2005-05-22 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sat, 21 May 2005 23:49:00 +0200, Pysiak Satriani said: I remember Hans saying that r4 is so stable that the developers themselves can not find any more bugs. Which in reality probably means It *probably* won't eat your data. Remember that the developers have a limited number of different

Re: Reiser4 O_DIRECT

2005-05-22 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 21 May 2005 23:49:00 +0200, Pysiak Satriani said: I remember Hans saying that r4 is so stable that the developers themselves can not find any more bugs. Which in reality probably means It *probably* won't eat

Re: Reiser4 O_DIRECT

2005-05-22 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sun, 22 May 2005 19:22:51 CDT, David Masover said: This is exactly why it should be in the kernel once the developers can't find any more bugs. Marked as experimental, mainly, but in the kernel where real users can throw cobol/Java/sql bastardizations at it and break it. Oh, I agree