Ivan put on what was left for him. Here two considerations began to trouble
-
link below :))
gate.b5zihmzizqygfbt7ytbpgbtb.dehairernfke.com
--
the glass nearly broke, the tops of the maples and lindens rustled
distasteful. Wrinkling his face, he asked Stravinsky in turn: 'You a
Thanks much Hifumi!
Chris, please comment on the patch.
Hans
Hifumi Hisashi wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I noticed that the Reiserfs has some problems related to meta-data
> journaling.
> I suppose that transactions regarding meta-data should be written to
> a disk every
> meta-data change (for ex
3.6 will always be supported for bug fixes, but will not receive new
features if I can help it. It is stable supported code, and should be
kept that way.
Regarding the journaling implementation, let's see what Chris says
before I comment.
Hans
michael chang wrote:
>On 8/31/05, Hifumi Hisashi <
On 8/31/05, Hifumi Hisashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> michael chang wrote:
>
> >Surely we don't want this. Look at the papers on Namesys's websites,
> >about the atomicaty and the banking example. But that's just my
> >personal opinion. Besides, I believe it's more likely that usually
> >the
michael chang wrote:
Surely we don't want this. Look at the papers on Namesys's websites,
about the atomicaty and the banking example. But that's just my
personal opinion. Besides, I believe it's more likely that usually
the power gets lost than the SCSI or IDE cable gets disconnected,
AFAIK.
michael chang wrote:
> And if he won't say it, I'll at least say that I'm rather greatful for
> this.
Thanks.
Hans Reiser wrote:
Jeff Mahoney wrote
The current implementation is hardly what I had envisioned ACLs and
xattrs being on reiserfs -- but was the only solution we could find to
still allow the filesystem to be mounted on an earlier kernel.
An ideal solution would have been to i
Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> Hans Reiser wrote:
>
> >I didn't have any role in the reiser3 acls. I would never have designed
> >them the way they got written. If you want high performance acls,
> >sponsor me to supervise the work for reiser4, and they will be very high
> >performance. Making them high
Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>
> michael chang wrote:
>
>>On 8/31/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Marc Perkel wrote:
>>>
>>>
Well - if it's so easy then what don't you just do it?
>>>I fund the things no one else will fund out of my pocket. The rest I
>>>wait
Bedros Hanounik schrieb:
>
> mkfs.reiserfs -l label will overwrite the old data; is there a way to edit
> the old lable w/o reformating the disk, other than hexedit the disk?
reiserfstune -l LABEL
should do the job.
(and xfs_admin for XFS, jfs_tune for JFS ;)
--
BOFH excuse #219:
Recursivit
Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando schrieb:
>
> This table is interesting but have really no sense the "no inclusion" of
> a minimal comparision about performance.
double negation...if i understand you correctly, you want a benchmark
comparison of the compared filesystems? uh, you know how hard it is to
com
> If you want high performance acls,
> sponsor me to supervise the work for reiser4, and they will be very high
> performance. Making them high performance in reiser4 is straightforward
> and easy.
How much would it cost?
1'000$ ? 10'000$?
-- Adrian
--
"Wow, I'm Dazzled!
These graphs are
here's a noob question. I have a usb HD using reiserfs 3.6
I want to change the label of the disk, so when it's automounted, the
mounting point has some meaning such as "backup" instead of "usbdisk"
fstab-sync seems to use the label of the disk to create a mounting point.
mkfs.reiserfs -l label
evilninja wrote:
Gregory Maxwell schrieb:
Someone might want to update the information on reiser4 at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems
This table is interesting but have really no sense the "no inclusion" of
a minimal comparision about performance.
Thanks,
Gio
evilninja schrieb:
> - Maximum filename length
> - Maximum pathname length (currently "No limit defined" <-- is this true?)
in the thread "REISERFS_MAX_NAME and ENAMETOOLONG" it is stated, that max.
filename length is not a kernel limit but a libc limit of 255 chars.
right? an in the same thread P
Gregory Maxwell schrieb:
> Someone might want to update the information on reiser4 at:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems
yeah, i noticed this too some time ago. so, what's the
- Maximum filename length
- Allowable characters in directory entries (e.g. "Any byte except N
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hans Reiser wrote:
> I didn't have any role in the reiser3 acls. I would never have designed
> them the way they got written. If you want high performance acls,
> sponsor me to supervise the work for reiser4, and they will be very high
> performance.
michael chang wrote:
On 8/31/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Well - if it's so easy then what don't you just do it?
I fund the things no one else will fund out of my pocket. The rest I
wait for sponsors for. I can on
michael chang wrote:
On 8/31/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Well - if it's so easy then what don't you just do it?
I fund the things no one else will fund out of my pocket. The rest I
wait for sponsors for. I can on
I see. For what it's worth If I had any money I'd give it to you.
Hans Reiser wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Well - if it's so easy then what don't you just do it?
I fund the things no one else will fund out of my pocket. The rest I
wa
On 8/31/05, LiFe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interestingly WinFS will revamp permissions drastically. Any query can be
> joined with any other query of like data.
>
> The queries are designed to return the data almost immediately, so it works
> fast.
>
> Queries can be much more complex.
This s
On 8/31/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marc Perkel wrote:
> > Well - if it's so easy then what don't you just do it?
>
> I fund the things no one else will fund out of my pocket. The rest I
> wait for sponsors for. I can only do so much, so I try to do what no
> one else will do.
>
On 8/31/05, Hifumi Hisashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I noticed that the Reiserfs has some problems related to meta-data
> journaling.
>I suppose that transactions regarding meta-data should be written to a
> disk every meta-data change (for example, i_size is increased) in
> ordered-mod
On 8/31/05, Kris Van Bruwaene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Both work for me, except on the reiserfs share...
I don't suppose your reiserfs share is mounted with noexec, is it?
Because that would explain the issue...
Check your fstab.
--
~Mike
- Just my two cents
- No man is an island, and no
Hello.
I noticed that the Reiserfs has some problems related to meta-data journaling.
I suppose that transactions regarding meta-data should be written to a
disk every
meta-data change (for example, i_size is increased) in ordered-mode while
synchronous
writing is performed. But, it seem
Interestingly WinFS will revamp permissions drastically. Any query can be
joined with any other query of like data.
ie, you can do a calandar query for people who you've had meetings with in
the last 30 days. Save the query. Then do a permissions query of all
permissions for a set of directori
Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
> Well - if it's so easy then what don't you just do it?
I fund the things no one else will fund out of my pocket. The rest I
wait for sponsors for. I can only do so much, so I try to do what no
one else will do.
27 matches
Mail list logo
