Hans Reiser wrote (ao):
This would not be (at least in theory) useful for RAID devices, but for
a user with a single disk drive, it might be useful to have a plugin
that creates two (or N) copies, and tries to allocate the two copies at
opposite ends of the disk. Anyone out there still looking
When unmounting my reiser4 partition today on my 2.6.14-rc5-mm1 kernel
I got the following:
Any ideas? Any way I can help track down this issue? I'm fscking now,
I will report results if desired.
Badness in __writeback_single_inode at fs/fs-writeback.c:251
[c017f433]
Sander wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote (ao):
This would not be (at least in theory) useful for RAID devices, but for
a user with a single disk drive, it might be useful to have a plugin
that creates two (or N) copies, and tries to allocate the two copies at
opposite ends of the disk. Anyone out
Hans Reiser wrote (ao):
It is only for very important files for computers which have only one
hard drive. Some of the work is with changing fsck.
Well, if the files are important, then you should have backups anyway,
whatever raid or similar you have. I still don't see an advantage in
ReiserFS 4.0 dumping a error message.
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at fs/reiser4/debug.c:141!
invalid operand: [#5]
Modules linked in: reiser4
CPU:0
EIP:0060:[f8b972f7]Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS: 00010202 (2.6.12)
EIP is at reiser4_do_panic+0x2f7/0x320
Sander wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote (ao):
It is only for very important files for computers which have only one
hard drive. Some of the work is with changing fsck.
Well, if the files are important, then you should have backups anyway,
whatever raid or similar you have. I still don't see
On 2005-10-25 02:28, Hans Reiser wrote:
And what is the advantage? You are not protected against a lot of disk
failures (only against bad blocks, right?).
It is only for very important files for computers which have only one
hard drive. Some of the work is with changing fsck.
I
Hi!
The discussion abot loosing important files made me think about a
fetaure I met and liked on DR-DOS (later Novell DOS but I'm not sure if
they kept this feature) which may be nice in Reiser4 and would probably
need an additional plugin.
I'll call it late delete as I can't remember how they
Hello
This does not look like reiser4 related problem. Please try with the attached
patch.
Avuton Olrich wrote:
When unmounting my reiser4 partition today on my 2.6.14-rc5-mm1 kernel
I got the following:
Any ideas? Any way I can help track down this issue? I'm fscking now,
I will report
Dnia Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:40:51 +0200, Vladimir V. Saveliev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
Hello
Abhijeet Anant Sane wrote:
ReiserFS 4.0 dumping a error message.
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at fs/reiser4/debug.c:141!
invalid operand: [#6]
Modules linked in: reiser4
I'll take a patch. Especially since I have proposed much the same in
the past. I'll discuss it more if someone starts writing one.;-)
Hans
Konstantin Münning wrote:
Hi!
The discussion abot loosing important files made me think about a
fetaure I met and liked on DR-DOS (later Novell DOS but
If yes, what steps did you take to do it?
Hans Reiser wrote:
John Gilmore wrote:
On Monday 24 October 2005 19:08, Edward Shishkin wrote:
John Gilmore wrote:
How are plugin/file
relationships handled without it?
For the first time there will be an option in mkfs to assign a file
plugin for
Konstantin Münning wrote:
Sander wrote:
Yes, having backups is better but that wouldn't help if it's your
laptop, the backups are 2000 miles away in your office and you have only
some Linux Boot CD?! ;-)
Many see Internet access as an essential utility, like running water.
If I have
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 14:13, Hans Reiser wrote:
If yes, what steps did you take to do it?
Not quite there yet, but would like to test it out.
Hans, could you give a status of Reiser4. I have seen allot of different
issues on the maillist, but not a status of where the overall project
Ron Joffe wrote:
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 14:13, Hans Reiser wrote:
If yes, what steps did you take to do it?
Not quite there yet, but would like to test it out.
Hans, could you give a status of Reiser4. I have seen allot of different
issues on the maillist, but not a status of where
Edward Shishkin wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote:
John Gilmore wrote:
So the first beta of compression will only have the option to
control it at mkfs time?
It should be explained that on the first flush to disk of a new file the
default compress plugin will test to see if the first 64k is
Ron Joffe wrote:
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 14:13, Hans Reiser wrote:
If yes, what steps did you take to do it?
Not quite there yet, but would like to test it out.
Hans, could you give a status of Reiser4. I have seen allot of different
issues on the maillist, but not a status of
David Masover wrote:
Ron Joffe wrote:
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 14:13, Hans Reiser wrote:
If yes, what steps did you take to do it?
Not quite there yet, but would like to test it out.
Hans, could you give a status of Reiser4. I have seen allot of
different issues on the maillist, but
Hello all,
I'm a student at the University of Victoria. Between myself and a few fellow
students we have embarked on a quest to do some experiments with the Reiser4
metadata system to show it off and provide some real world use cases.
We'll be spending lots of time on this project between now
Is there a means by which I can actually use files as directories?
I have enabled the directories, but, well, the log speaks for itself:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/reiser $ cp ../artist A2.mp3/
Segmentation fault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/reiser $ cp ../artist A2.mp3/TAB
freeze terminal
Peter van Hardenberg wrote:
Hello all,
I'm a student at the University of Victoria. Between myself and a few fellow
students we have embarked on a quest to do some experiments with the Reiser4
metadata system to show it off and provide some real world use cases.
We'll be spending lots of time
On October 25, 2005 04:08 pm, you wrote:
Peter van Hardenberg wrote:
Hello all,
I'm a student at the University of Victoria. Between myself and a few
fellow students we have embarked on a quest to do some experiments with
the Reiser4 metadata system to show it off and provide some real
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:04:55 -0700, Peter van Hardenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
[...]
I envision creating a simple shell in a scripting language which will
operate on an XML representation of the filesystem which maps, in the
simple case, directories and files such that simple xpath queries
Hi all,
I've prepared a modified installer disk for Slackware Linux 10.2 which
allows to install this distro on Reiser4 partitions almost the same
way you do with other FSes (ext2/3, reiserfs etc), i.e. with no kernel
recompilation by yourself etc. It is now under internal testing (i.e.
installed
Valentine Sinitsyn wrote:
Hi all,
I've prepared a modified installer disk for Slackware Linux 10.2 which
allows to install this distro on Reiser4 partitions almost the same
way you do with other FSes (ext2/3, reiserfs etc), i.e. with no kernel
recompilation by yourself etc. It is now under
26 matches
Mail list logo