On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 12:20 -0700, Peter van Hardenberg wrote:
> On October 27, 2005 04:17 am, David Masover wrote:
> > Peter van Hardenberg wrote:
> > > On October 26, 2005 10:02 am, John Gilmore wrote:
> > >
> > > And I thought the whole idea was to unify the namespace and make things
> > > like
On October 27, 2005 04:17 am, David Masover wrote:
> Peter van Hardenberg wrote:
> > On October 26, 2005 10:02 am, John Gilmore wrote:
> >
> > And I thought the whole idea was to unify the namespace and make things
> > like ID3 tags obsolete...
>
> The two are not mutually exclusive. You unify the
On Thursday 27 October 2005 12:05, Alexander G. M. Smith wrote:
> John Gilmore wrote on Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:02:06 +:
> > I had understood that a big part of the issue with file-as-directory was
> > the same as the issue with hard links to directories. Which I thought is
> > that if you move one
"du -shx" reports 9.5GB
I'm running latest from gentoo, so I assume it's 3.6.19.
I ran fsck.reiserfs from gentoo liveCD 2005.1 and at the end I got zero errors.
The problem could be fixed, I could tar the whole root directory to an
external drive, format the partition and then tar it back. but
Alexander G. M. Smith wrote:
>John Gilmore wrote on Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:02:06 +:
>
>
>>I had understood that a big part of the issue with file-as-directory was the
>>same as the issue with hard links to directories. Which I thought is that if
>>you move one directory into another, you can
Edward Shishkin wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote:
Particularly, define whether large
files that cannot be compressed get stored using extents and everything
else that regular files use.
Currently files powered by cryptcompress file plugin have its data
stored only in the
items of CTAIL_ID
A
John Gilmore wrote on Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:02:06 +:
> I had understood that a big part of the issue with file-as-directory was the
> same as the issue with hard links to directories. Which I thought is that if
> you move one directory into another, you can lose the connection to the root
> of
LiFe wrote:
> Got 1390 msgs in this group waiting to get read, and I'll go through
> some eventually.
>
> Hans, I was wondering if you had approached or been approached by Google
> re funding, as they may be interested in Reiser for some of their
> massive storage requirements.
Watch for another
Sander wrote:
> Gregory Maxwell wrote (ao):
>
>>On 10/25/05, Sander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Cheaper how? Two disks are cheaper than one?
>
>
> If you opt for a copy of everything, yes. Because of a 500GB drive only
> half of it is effectively usable. Two 250GB disks raid1 are much cheaper
Peter van Hardenberg wrote:
> On October 26, 2005 10:02 am, John Gilmore wrote:
>
>>Actually, when I had first read about file-as-directory, I had assumed that
>>the content was either dynamically generated from the on-disk metadata
>>(like uid, gid, etc) or stored as a "sideband" type stream in t
Hello
Bedros Hanounik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using reiserfs for several years now and it's been choice
> number one for me; I'll probably switch to reiser4 once it's in the main
> kernel.
>
> on my home file server machine, one hard drive (120GB) reports 80 GB
> used, but I have no idea how
John Gilmore wrote:
>On Wednesday 26 October 2005 22:40, Nate Diller wrote:
>
>
>>File-as-Directory
>> The issue with file-as-directory (FaD) is that it removes the Acyclic
>>property of the namespace graph. This is because anything which contains
>>file data can be hard-linked, even if that i
Got 1390 msgs in this group waiting to get read, and I'll go through some
eventually.
Hans, I was wondering if you had approached or been approached by Google re
funding, as they may be interested in Reiser for some of their massive
storage requirements.
Hello
Michael James wrote:
> What tools or options are there for recovering files,
> deleted and current from a dd partition image?
>
Please describe the problem in more details.
Am I correct that you mistakenly rm-ed something from a filesystem and then
umounted it and dd-ed it into dd-file-im
What tools or options are there for recovering files,
deleted and current from a dd partition image?
ls -l dd-file-image
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11745699840 2005-10-27 16:46
dd-file-image
It was a SuSE 9.0 system running on reiser 3.6
/mnt/sbin/mkfs.reiserfs -V
mkfs.reiserfs
Gregory Maxwell wrote (ao):
> On 10/25/05, Sander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That will kill performance badly. First of all the two read/writes
> > needed, and second because you have to seek from one end to the disk
> > to the other every time you read/write something.
>
> Kill it worse for w
16 matches
Mail list logo
