Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
Running with '--fix-fixable' finds the same errors, and says
that it fixed them; but running again finds the same problem again.
Additional clues: the FS (being version 3.5) does not support files over
2GB.
All 3 files with the problem are a result of a (recent) progr
Greetings,
I had recent corruption of my (rather old) reiserfs filesystem.
Attempt to check it with 'reiserfsck' finds errors and says I
should run with '--fix-fixable'.
Running with '--fix-fixable' finds the same errors, and says
that it fixed them; but running again finds the same problem aga
How does this http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11448928423 impact
reiser4's atomic writes?
hello
On Saturday 15 April 2006 23:14, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am using a reiserfs partition mounted using Redhat Enterprise's
> 2.6.9-22.0.1.EL (rebuilt), and I have files that refuse to delete:
Are there any reiserfs error messages in the system logs?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] proc]# l
Hi all,
I am using a reiserfs partition mounted using Redhat Enterprise's
2.6.9-22.0.1.EL (rebuilt), and I have files that refuse to delete:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] proc]# ls -al p*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Apr 15 20:50 partitions
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Apr 15 20:50 pci
[EMAIL PROTECTED] proc]#
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 06:17:33PM +0400, Alexander Zarochentsev wrote:
> hello,
>
> On Saturday 15 April 2006 12:57, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > Can you put the following in -mm please? I cc'ed Hans about it
> > earlier. Basically, resier4 does not present a good reason why
> > page
hello,
On Saturday 15 April 2006 12:57, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Can you put the following in -mm please? I cc'ed Hans about it
> earlier. Basically, resier4 does not present a good reason why
> pagecache should be dropped here.
correct. it duplicates remove_mapping().
we tested simi
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 10:57:58AM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Can you put the following in -mm please? I cc'ed Hans about it earlier.
I did test it under reclaim pressure, btw. Seems to be working OK.
Hi Andrew,
Can you put the following in -mm please? I cc'ed Hans about it earlier.
Basically, resier4 does not present a good reason why pagecache should
be dropped here. Basically the exact same operations are performed by
releasepage callers (reclaim or truncate). If there is some atomicity
prob
