David Masover wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Anyway I guess you are smarter than Hans then since you obviously
feel that his use of fsync is a bit of unneeded integrity.
I'm not going to respond to this until you phrase it in a way which
doesn't gossip about Hans. Unless something has changed,
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 16:53 +0100, Enrico Cavalli wrote:
>
>
> Ok, so maybe a solution would be using 8k as block size? Or this would
> not be a solution?
It seems that using 8k makes the filesystem not mountable (but
reiserfsck works)
>
--
Enrico Cavalli
CILEA - via R. Sanzio 4, 20090
So, you have to have a way to insure data integrity beyond flushing it
to disk. Flushing it to disk is just a bit of unneeded integrity, that
costs a little bit of performance, and would probably save your ass in
one or two edge cases, but those cases shouldn't normally happen, and if
you're
Hi there,
First of all this discussion is about ... well isn't it of topic here at all?
journaling support has been late on Linux. Everything seems to be late
on Linux. Real-time support, preemptive support...
Yes Linux is late on everything because things are done when there is
_real_ demand
