On 23:14 Tue 14 Mar , Hans Reiser wrote:
> I generally believe that the per 4k
> approach used throughout the linux kernel is not as CPU efficient as
> sending larger groups of pages through the layers all at once. In other
> words, there is a reason we have bios, and we need to learn the less
On 10:29 Wed 15 Mar , Hans Reiser wrote:
> Tell the mosix guys we would be willing to cooperate with them regarding
> their problem.
If it was that easy... The problem for openMosix is that most devices
fetch data in 4k blocks via copy_from_user(). For migrated processes,
openMosix intercepts
On 12:43 Wed 15 Mar , Hans Reiser wrote:
> I am the reiserfs/reiser4 sub-maintainer. So, if reiser4 works well,
> and is faster than any other Linux FS, and it is, maintaining it over
> time is for me to worry about, not them.
I feel this thread is about to trail off to shores we all know t
Hi
On 13:55 Fri 24 Mar , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> now the question is how to recover that file ?
I had a similar problem. For me TestDisk saved the day. It can recover
most, if not all, partitions even without the partition table:
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk
Last update was
On 14:49 Mon 19 Jun , Tom Vier wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 10:12:14PM +0200, Gert wrote:
> > Dunno if this is the right place to ask but does anyone know of any Open
> > Source solutions that can back up Reiser/Ext3 on OES Linux and NSS on OES
> > NW?
>
> I use the standard gnu tar -g (in
> Don't get too excited -- the transactions probably aren't done yet. Without
> those, no filesystem that claims to journal data is really any better than a
> filesystem which only journals metadata. Even once
> they are implemented (or even if they are already), applications have to
> support
On 14:37 Fri 21 Jul , Mike Benoit wrote:
> No Linux file system that I'm aware of has a defragmentor, but they DO
> become fragmented, just not near as bad as FAT32 used to when MS created
> their defragmentor.
Forgotten ext2? ;-) Funny thing: If your ext3 got too fragmented:
convert it back t
On 17:45 Fri 21 Jul , David Masover wrote:
> Question, then: Can the ext2 defrag work on a raw ext3 partition, without
> having to convert it first?
Dunno, but I don't think so
pgp3cS9WVSQCi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 02:28 Wed 09 Aug , Hans Reiser wrote:
> >Unfortunately, it's not one of which editors approve. It too easily
> >looks as though the writer is being influenced by the source.
> >
> >
>
> >If I were to do so, I'd risk being banned from publication.
Uhm... interesting. It's not that I hav
