On Thu, 02/12/04 at 17:10:19 +0300, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> so dev is devfs. ok, would you then
> stat ide/host0/bus1/target0/lun0/part7
> ?
>
> looks like rdev of the device file on devfs does not match to dev of its
> mount point.
I've done some of this stuff too, in case it is useful, at
t may help you help me)
Sincerely,
Brandon Low
bash-2.05b# cat /proc/mounts
rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0
/dev/root / reiserfs ro 0 0
none /dev/devfs ro 0 0
proc /proc proc rw 0 0
bash-2.05b# touch /blah
touch: cannot touch `/blah': Read-only file system
bash-2.05b# /sbin/reiserfsck -a /dev/hda3
On Tue, 08/05/03 at 23:08:31 +0200, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> BTW, from your numbers it seems ext3 gives better overall performance.
>
That is an incorrect statement. Reiserfs is KNOWN to be heavier on CPU
than other filesystems, it's benefit is not there, it's benefit is in
speed of operation
Did you folks upload a replacement tarball about 4 hours after the
original? Want to make sure that the tarball mismatch is intentional
before I approve the new one...
--Brandon
I may be stupid, but if the latest release is 3.6.2 why is the "LATEST IS"
link still pointing to 3.x.1b? Is 3.6.2 the version which we (Gentoo
Linux) should be packaging? Is it more or less safe than 3.x.1b? Thanks!
--Brandon
On Wed, 07/10/02 at 12:06:48 +0400, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
>
> H
