[reiserfs-list] Re: Note describing poor dcache utilization under high memory pressure

2002-01-28 Thread Daniel Phillips
On January 28, 2002 07:21 pm, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Rik van Riel wrote: I'd be interested to know exactly how much overhead -rmap is causing for both page faults and fork (but I'm sure one of the regular benchmarkers can figure that one out while I fix the RSS

[reiserfs-list] Re: Note describing poor dcache utilization under high memory pressure

2002-01-28 Thread Daniel Phillips
On January 28, 2002 11:01 pm, Momchil Velikov wrote: Daniel == Daniel Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Daniel I'd cheerfully hand this coding effort off to someone more familiar with this Daniel particular neck of the kernel woods - you, Davem and Marcelo come to mind, Daniel

[reiserfs-list] Re: 2.4.7-ac4 disk thrashing

2001-08-08 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Wednesday 08 August 2001 12:57, Alan Cox wrote: Could it be that the ReiserFS cleanups in ac4 do harm? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dreiserfsm=3D99683332027428w=3D2 I suspect the use once patch is the more relevant one. Two things to check: - Linus found a bug in

[reiserfs-list] Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup)

2001-05-25 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Friday 25 May 2001 00:00, Hans Reiser wrote: Daniel Phillips wrote: I suppose I'm just reiterating the obvious, but we should eventually have a generic filesystem transaction API at the VFS level, once we have enough data points to know what the One True API should be. Daniel