Re: Which version will be merged into mainline kernel?

you're experiencing are caused by the fsync() call not being well-optimized in reiser4. I've commented out the function in fs/buffer.c, and I'm having much better performance on my / partition. HTH, Francesco -- Dr. Francesco Biscani Dipartimento di Astronomia Università di Padova [EMAIL

Re: reiser4 for 2.6.16 (version 3)

-- Dr. Francesco Biscani Dipartimento di Astronomia Università di Padova [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: possible reiser4 bug

without the patch it hanged quite soon. Thanks and regards, Francesco -- Dr. Francesco Biscani Dipartimento di Astronomia Università di Padova [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: possible reiser4 bug

On Saturday 25 February 2006 22:09, Alexander Zarochentsev wrote: would you please try the attached patch. I'm having a similar problem on 2.6.16-rc4 + reiser4 from -mm1. I will be testing the attached patch. Regards, Francesco -- Dr. Francesco Biscani Dipartimento di Astronomia

Re: More Slowdown

this function? Thanks, Francesco -- Dr. Francesco Biscani Dipartimento di Astronomia Università di Padova [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: hard hang with reiser4-for-2.6.11-5 and VMware Workstation 5.0

guess it features the recent updates? Many thanks, Francesco -- Dr. Francesco Biscani Dipartimento di Astronomia Università di Padova [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 2.6.9-3 patch won't compile

On Monday 13 December 2004 13:44, Lex Jonkers wrote: yes i ment the namesys 2.6.9-[1-3] patches. Any idea why -3 won't compile on a vanilla 2.6.9 ? -1 and -2 compile without problems. It compiles for me (gcc 3.4.3, vanilla kernel). Which compiler are you using? Regards, -- Dr. Francesco

Re: Vanilla kernel patch

would like to hear from the devs about this issue. I've got my / partition on reiser4, so forgive me if I'm pretty picky about this ;-) Best regards, -- Dr. Francesco Biscani Dipartimento di Astronomia Università di Padova [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0xQEntj6R4.pgp Description: PGP signature

Vanilla kernel patch

rid of the undeclared function warning gcc gave. Now all reiser4 stuff compiles with no warnings at all. What are the pitfalls I'm falling in, doing this? Is this safe or is there stuff in -mm that is absolutely needed by reiser4? Thanks! -- Dr. Francesco Biscani Dipartimento di Astronomia

Re: reiser4 disk formats (was http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.09-internal.testing/)

Hi, On Monday 16 August 2004 01:27, Domenico Andreoli wrote: what is confusing me is Vitaly saying: The converter (debugfs.reiser4 -C) is supposed to be run on consistent fs of course, so probably it is worth to check/fix it with the current reiser4progs before any update. probably with

Re: fsck.reiser4 wrong size error (?)

Hi, On Thursday 12 August 2004 22:08, Alex Zarochentsev wrote: a. mkfs.reiser4 has options to set default fibration plugin. b. you can change fibration plugin for empty dir through metas/ interface. and On Thursday 12 August 2004 22:31, Vitaly Fertman wrote: default plugins in progs play

fsck.reiser4 wrong size error (?)

Hi, lately whenever I run fsck.reiser4 I get loads of errors about wrong sizes, e.g., something like [1] Object foo (stat40) has wrong size, should be X bytes. fsck suggests to --fix them, which I do, and indeed another run of fsck confirms that there are no problems. However after mounting

Re: fsck.reiser4 wrong size error (?)

Hi, are messages about 'wrong size' or about 'wrong bytes' or both? I'm _almost_ sure it's about wrong bytes. I'll confirm ASAP. Are they potentially harmful? Oh, BTW, debugfs -C worked ok here. Regards, Francesco

reiser4 crash

Hi, I had reiser4 crash pretty badly. Here's the story. My distribution is Gentoo. As you probably know it uses as packaging system a tool called emerge which basically installs applications following installation scripts called ebuilds. Usually packages are compiled from sources, but not