On 7/17/06, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Replacing / with ! is hideous. Someone added a nifty elegance to block
device naming, and you are desecrating it.
You're free to send a patch to fix it all, you know. Until then, lets
make reiserfs consistent with rest of the kernel, ok?
On 9/9/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 8. Remove all assertions because they clutter the code and make it hard to
> read
I don't think anyone suggested to remove _all_ assertions. I did,
however, suggested to tone down some of the ones that seem overly
defensive and clutter the code
Andrew Morton wrote:
> > There's also the custom list, hash and debug code. We should either
> >
> > a) remove them or
> >
> > b) generify them and submit as standalone works or
> >
> > c) justify them as custom-to-reiser4 and leave them as-is.
On 6/29/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 21:32 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> then it's impossible to know which one it is without the identical
> source at hand.
In which case, debugging is risky IMO (the source code could have
changed a lot).
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 21:32 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> That said, I do
Hi Hans,
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > We have to maintain said ugly code for decades.
On 6/23/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No you don't, I do.
Lots of people work on the kernel. If you wish to keep reiser4
maintenance to yourself, you probably need to keep it as a separate
patch. Pleas
Hi Hans,
On 6/22/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would in particular love to have you Andi Kleen do a full review of V4
> if you could be that generous with your time, as I liked much of the
> advice you gave us on V3.
Well, I am not Andi Kleen and this is not even in the ballpark
