Re: journal size reiserfs vs reiser4

2005-09-01 Thread Peter Staubach
reiser4 reserves 5% of disk space for its internal needs. 5% of today's big disks seems a little excessive. Does reiser4 really need that much space or would less also suffice without compromising performance? Is there research available which makes up the basis for the 5% number? Thanx

Re: journal size reiserfs vs reiser4

2005-09-01 Thread Peter Staubach
Hans Reiser wrote: Research for filesystems generally says that as you get more than 85% full the performance goes down, by a lot as you get close to 100%. 5% is probably too little rather than too much. Wow. What is all that space used for? Other journalling file systems that I have see

Re: journal size reiserfs vs reiser4

2005-09-01 Thread Peter Staubach
Hans Reiser wrote: Wow. What is all that space used for? Other journalling file systems that I have seen have limited things like journals to a much smaller space, BSD FFS has a 10% limit unless you are root. They are correct to do so. Yes, they reserve that space so that

Re: journal size reiserfs vs reiser4

2005-09-01 Thread Peter Staubach
Hans Reiser wrote: Journaling, and reserving space for good allocation, are totally different concerns, I don't understand why you guys are conflating them. Agreed, that journaling and reserving space for good allocation are separate, except that often the space for the journal is reserved