On 8/2/06, Krzysztof Halasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kyle Moffett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMHO the best alternative for a situation like that is a storage
> controller with a battery-backed cache and a hunk of flash NVRAM for
> when the power shuts off (just in case you run out of batter
=)
That was sorta the plan.
Any idea how the fragmentation resulting from re-syncing the tree
affects performance over time?
Wil
On 7/30/06, Christian Trefzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 11:39:42PM +0200, Christian Trefzer wrote:
>
> In order to avoid having to pull the
Hmm, looks like I have a partition to re-format now.
Wil
On 7/30/06, Christian Trefzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 03:30:15PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
>
> Is /usr/portage still faster on Reiser4? I know it was when I switched,
> but that was years ago...
It is for su
> Requirements:
> - basic knowledge of computer (email),
Computers? Email? Ooohhh, sounds technical. Think I saw those in a
movie once.
> - free time (approx 1 hour per day),
Free time? FREE TIME? Ha. I'll pencil you in for sometime in 2008.
> - good communication skills
BWWAAHHAAAHHAAAHH
u can go back to
> a previous release.
>
> --- Wil Reichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've been running VMWare 5 on my reiser4 partition
> > for a while now and
> > haven't had any of the above issues. Usually doing
> > CPU intensive
&
I've been running VMWare 5 on my reiser4 partition for a while now and
haven't had any of the above issues. Usually doing CPU intensive
stuff too, aka WebSphere Portal servers. I use an -mm kernel, if that
matters.
Wil
On 6/17/05, E.Gryaznova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Thank you f
