Re: [reiserfs-list] Boot failure: msdos pushes in front of reiserfs

2002-01-28 Thread Matthias Andree
Hubert Mantel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Installation time is after boot time. Use a Unix-style file system. Go >> for minix, that's small and will not get in the way. > > So the modules floppy would need to be minix also. We had that in the > past. No need, you can load fat.o + vfat.o from

Re: [reiserfs-list] Boot failure: msdos pushes in front of reiserfs

2002-01-17 Thread Hubert Mantel
Hi, On Thu, Jan 17, Oleg Drokin wrote: > > > initrd, and thus at the bottom of the list. Strange enough SuSE compile > > > MSDOS which hardly anyone needs at boot time into the kernel, but not > > > reiserfs (admittedly, reiserfs takes up some memory, but then, it's a > > FAT is needed in order

Re: [reiserfs-list] Boot failure: msdos pushes in front of reiserfs

2002-01-16 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 07:53:16PM +0100, Hubert Mantel wrote: > > initrd, and thus at the bottom of the list. Strange enough SuSE compile > > MSDOS which hardly anyone needs at boot time into the kernel, but not > > reiserfs (admittedly, reiserfs takes up some memory, but then, it's a >

Re: [reiserfs-list] Boot failure: msdos pushes in front of reiserfs

2002-01-16 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 06:47:12PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: > > Looking at init/main.c and fs/super.c, rootfsflags parameter is never > > saved, moreover - it's original value is destroyed, once initrd fs is > > mounted. And I only see not very nice ways of fixing this, so perhaps >

Re: [reiserfs-list] Boot failure: msdos pushes in front of reiserfs

2002-01-15 Thread Hubert Mantel
Hi, On Tue, Jan 15, Matthias Andree wrote: > initrd, and thus at the bottom of the list. Strange enough SuSE compile > MSDOS which hardly anyone needs at boot time into the kernel, but not > reiserfs (admittedly, reiserfs takes up some memory, but then, it's a FAT is needed in order to access s

Re: [reiserfs-list] Boot failure: msdos pushes in front of reiserfs

2002-01-15 Thread Matthias Andree
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Oleg Drokin wrote: > Looking at init/main.c and fs/super.c, rootfsflags parameter is never > saved, moreover - it's original value is destroyed, once initrd fs is > mounted. And I only see not very nice ways of fixing this, so perhaps > someone more exeprienced can come up w