Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS data corruption in very simple configuration

2001-10-03 Thread Toby Dickenson
>Of course. If you want data to hit the disk, you have to use fsync. This >does work with reiserfs and will ensure that the data hits the disk. If >you don't do this then bad things might happen. This is probably a naive question, but this thread has already proved me wrong on one naive assumptio

[reiserfs-list] ReiserFS data corruption in very simple configuration

2001-09-30 Thread foner-reiserfs
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 03:26:27 +0200 From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 09:00:49PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > extending a file, the metadata is written -last-, e.g., file blocks > are allocated, file data is written, and -then- met

Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS data corruption in very simple configuration

2001-09-30 Thread pcg
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 09:00:49PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > extending a file, the metadata is written -last-, e.g., file blocks > are allocated, file data is written, and -then- metadata is written. this is almost impossible to achieve with existing hardware (witness the many discussions

[reiserfs-list] ReiserFS data corruption in very simple configuration

2001-09-30 Thread foner-reiserfs
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 14:52:29 +0200 From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> Thanks for your response! Bear with me, though, because I'm asking a design question below that relates to this. On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 12:44:59AM -0400, Lenny Foner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[reiserfs-list] ReiserFS data corruption in very simple configuration

2001-09-28 Thread Lenny Foner
[As before, please make sure you CC me on replies or I won't see them. Tnx!] Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:28:54 +0100 From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi, On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 04:44:21PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Stock reiserfs only provides meta-