Re: [reiserfs-list] optimizing reiserfs for large files?

2001-06-25 Thread Matthew Hawkins
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Christian Gottschalch wrote: only problem, is reiserfs real stable for an production system ?? need no high performance, only stability, and journaling, so i think i'll try GFS looks more stable, XFS looks nice too, but i think its to new too, means some little

Re: [reiserfs-list] optimizing reiserfs for large files?

2001-06-22 Thread Russell Coker
On Thursday 14 June 2001 12:18, grobe wrote: I have a significant loss of performance in bonnie tests. The writing intelligently-test e.g. gives me 20710 kB/s with reiserfs, while I get 24753 kB/s with ext2 (1 GB-file). How much RAM do you have? If you have more than 512M of RAM then the

Re: [reiserfs-list] optimizing reiserfs for large files?

2001-06-22 Thread Russell Coker
On Saturday 23 June 2001 01:11, Lars O. Grobe wrote: Also neither of those results is what you should expect from modern hardware. Machines that were typically sold in corner stores about a year ago (such as the machine under my desk) return results better than that. I have attached the

Re: [reiserfs-list] optimizing reiserfs for large files?

2001-06-14 Thread Chris Mason
On Thursday, June 14, 2001 12:54:11 PM +0200 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Don, 14 Jun 2001, grobe wrote: I have a significant loss of performance in bonnie tests. The writing intelligently-test e.g. gives me 20710 kB/s with reiserfs, while I get 24753 kB/s with ext2 (1