Hello
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 12:36, Markus TЖrnqvist wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 01:48:13PM -, Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
> >Am I completely loosing it ?
> >
> >Using 2.6.10-rc2-mm3 allows me to go into a file as a directory when
> >the file has the executable flag...that shouldn't be happ
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:40:08AM -, Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
>Forgive my short-sightedness in this respect, but where's the benefit in this
>approach?:)
This is one of those shitfests that I really don't want to touch.
It's an approach that has a lot of potential but there's not much
prac
Forgive my short-sightedness in this respect, but where's the benefit in this
approach?:)
-Original Message-
From: Markus Törnqvist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 December 2004 09:36
To: Yiannis Mavroukakis
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Does this look right?
On Mon, N
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 01:48:13PM -, Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
>Am I completely loosing it ?
>
>Using 2.6.10-rc2-mm3 allows me to go into a file as a directory when
>the file has the executable flag...that shouldn't be happening, should
>it?
Is this a sign that files-as-dirs are seen stable
Am I completely loosing it ?
Using 2.6.10-rc2-mm3 allows me to go into a file as a directory when
the file has the executable flag...that shouldn't be happening, should
it?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ls -l file
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 2004-11-29 13:50 file
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cd file
[EMAIL PROTECT
