Am Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2003 12:57 schrieb Oleg Drokin:
> Hello!
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:47:53PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> > > > Somewhat.
> > > > Mouse movement is OK, now. But...
> > > > 1+0 Records aus
> > > > 0.000u 3.090s 0:16.81 18.3% 0+0k 0+0io 153pf+0w
> > > > 0.000u 0.050s 0:0
Hello!
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:47:53PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> > > Somewhat.
> > > Mouse movement is OK, now. But...
> > > 1+0 Records aus
> > > 0.000u 3.090s 0:16.81 18.3% 0+0k 0+0io 153pf+0w
> > > 0.000u 0.050s 0:00.27 18.5% 0+0k 0+0io 122pf+0w
> > > INSTALL/SOURCE> time dd if=/
Am Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2003 12:35 schrieb Oleg Drokin:
> Hello!
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:55:09PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> > Somewhat.
> > Mouse movement is OK, now. But...
> >
> > 1+0 Records aus
> > 0.000u 3.090s 0:16.81 18.3% 0+0k 0+0io 153pf+0w
> > 0.000u 0.050s 0:00.27 18.5% 0
Hello!
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:55:09PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> Somewhat.
> Mouse movement is OK, now. But...
>
> 1+0 Records aus
> 0.000u 3.090s 0:16.81 18.3% 0+0k 0+0io 153pf+0w
> 0.000u 0.050s 0:00.27 18.5% 0+0k 0+0io 122pf+0w
> INSTALL/SOURCE> time dd if=/dev/zero of=sparse1
Am Dienstag, 15. Juli 2003 19:05 schrieb Oleg Drokin:
> Hello!
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:48:58PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> > !
> >! The 'right' questions are:
> > * Are the 204,804 MB really needed?
>
>
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Dieter [iso-8859-1] Nützel wrote:
> >
> >>More than 506 times...
> >>=> 506.34 seconds (8:26.34) / 0.01 seconds = 50.634 times ;-)))
> >
> > I guess you mean 50,634 or 50634 times faster? But I
Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Dieter [iso-8859-1] Nützel wrote:
>
>>More than 506 times...
>>=> 506.34 seconds (8:26.34) / 0.01 seconds = 50.634 times ;-)))
>
> I guess you mean 50,634 or 50634 times faster? But I'm afraid you didn't
> test what you should have. Interestingly,
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Dieter [iso-8859-1] Nützel wrote:
> As reminder the old numbers (single U160, IBM 10k rpm):
For the below test, disk doesn't really matter. It's almost [should be (*)]
pure CPU job. Otherwise I'd have suggested a 'sync' at the end(**).
> 2.4.21-jam1 (aa1) plus all data-logg
Am Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 20:32 schrieb Chris Mason:
> On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 13:27, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > > 2.5 porting work has restarted at last, Oleg's really been helpful with
> > > keeping the 2.4 stuff up to date.
> >
> > Nice but.
> >
> > Patches against latest -aa could be helpful, then.
Hello Dieter,
Before we used to host web files so reiserfs + quota was mandatory. We could live
without the data-logging
code. Now that we use reiserfs for fsync intensive applications, data-logging + quota
+ latest
IO improvements from Chris that were committed recently in 2.4.22-pre and it w
On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 13:27, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > 2.5 porting work has restarted at last, Oleg's really been helpful with
> > keeping the 2.4 stuff up to date.
>
> Nice but.
>
> Patches against latest -aa could be helpful, then.
Hmmm, the latest -aa isn't all that latest right now. Do you
Am Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 19:09 schrieb Chris Mason:
> On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 11:44, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:34:12PM +0200, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> > > > Actually I did it already, as data-logging patches can be applied to
> > > > 2.4.22-pre3 (where
On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 11:44, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:34:12PM +0200, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
>
> > > Actually I did it already, as data-logging patches can be applied to
> > > 2.4.22-pre3 (where this truncate patch was included).
> > > > Maybe it _IS_ time
Hello!
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:34:12PM +0200, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> > Actually I did it already, as data-logging patches can be applied to
> > 2.4.22-pre3 (where this truncate patch was included).
> > > Maybe it _IS_ time for this _AND_ all the other data-logging patches?
> > > 2.4.
Gello!
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:32:49PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> > > OK some "hand work"...
> Where comes this from?
It was there for a lot of time. Like for not less than 2 years, I'd say.
> I don't find it my tree:
reiserfs quota patch got rid of it.
Here's relevant part of my diff:
Am Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 17:36 schrieb Marc-Christian Petersen:
> On Friday 11 July 2003 17:32, Dieter Nützel wrote:
>
> Hi Dieter,
>
> > Where comes this from?
> > I don't find it my tree:
> >
> > fs/eiserfs/inode.c
> >
> > -if (un.unfm_nodenum)
> > inode->i_blocks +=
Am Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 17:32 schrieb Oleg Drokin:
> Hello!
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:27:25PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> > > Actually I did it already, as data-logging patches can be applied to
> > > 2.4.22-pre3 (where this truncate patch was included).
> >
> > No -aaX.
>
> Right.
>
> > >
On Friday 11 July 2003 17:32, Dieter Nützel wrote:
Hi Dieter,
> Where comes this from?
> I don't find it my tree:
>
> fs/eiserfs/inode.c
>
> -if (un.unfm_nodenum)
> inode->i_blocks += inode->i_sb->s_blocksize / 512;
> //mark_tail_converted (inode);
reise
On Friday 11 July 2003 17:24, Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hi Oleg,
> Actually I did it already, as data-logging patches can be applied to
> 2.4.22-pre3 (where this truncate patch was included).
> > Maybe it _IS_ time for this _AND_ all the other data-logging patches?
> > 2.4.22-pre5?
> It's Chris turn. I
Am Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 17:24 schrieb Oleg Drokin:
> Hello!
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:16:56PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> > OK some "hand work"...
Where comes this from?
I don't find it my tree:
fs/eiserfs/inode.c
-if (un.unfm_nodenum)
inode->i_blocks += ino
Hello!
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:27:25PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> > Actually I did it already, as data-logging patches can be applied to
> > 2.4.22-pre3 (where this truncate patch was included).
> No -aaX.
Right.
> > > Maybe it _IS_ time for this _AND_ all the other data-logging patches?
>
Am Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 17:24 schrieb Oleg Drokin:
> Hello!
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:16:56PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> > OK some "hand work"...
>
> Actually I did it already, as data-logging patches can be applied to
> 2.4.22-pre3 (where this truncate patch was included).
No -aaX.
> >
22 matches
Mail list logo
