Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2

Hello Hesse, Christian wrote: > Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: >>Please try whether the attached patch improves anything. It simplifies >>fsync by avoid commiting of transactions which do not modify file being >>fsync-ed. >> >>The patch applied to 2.6.14-mm2 with warnings, but that can be ignored. >

Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2

Hi again, > > http://www.earthworm.de/tmp/reiser4-fsync.c > > > > with 2.6.13: > > sync() = 0 <0.000198> > > fsync(3)= 0 <0.003353> > > > > with 2.6.14 (with and without patch): > > sync() = 0 <2.09

Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2

Me again, meanwhile I've applied this patch to my 2.6.14-mm2 (gentoo): ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.14-mm2/reiser4-for-2.6.14-mm2-1.patch.gz ...and I've got to say: THANK YOU! This patch has cured my slow system, everything's running normal again. Everything? Well, I'm not so su

Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2

On Thursday 17 November 2005 18:22, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: > Hello > > Hesse, Christian wrote: > > Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: > >>Please try whether the attached patch improves anything. It simplifies > >>fsync by avoid commiting of transactions which do not modify file being > >>fsync-ed. >

Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2

Seems like there's a bug in your patch > ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.14-mm2/reiser4-for-2.6.14-mm2-1.patch.gz [ cut here ] kernel BUG at fs/reiser4/block_alloc.c:149! invalid operand: [#1] last sysfs file: /class/vc/vcsa7/dev Modules linked in: snd_o

Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2

Hello. Hesse, Christian wrote: On Thursday 17 November 2005 18:22, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: Hello Hesse, Christian wrote: Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: Please try whether the attached patch improves anything. It simplifies fsync by avoid commiting of transactions which do no

Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2

E.Gryaznova wrote: Unfortunately we are not able to reproduce this slowdown. Would you please provide more info?: Is this 2.6.14-mm2 bad sync/fsync performance reproducible on fresh created reiser4 too? Are these values stable reproducible? If you run this test several time -- do you have the s

Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2

On 11/21/05, E.Gryaznova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately we are not able to reproduce this slowdown. Would you > please provide more info?: > Is this 2.6.14-mm2 bad sync/fsync performance reproducible on fresh > created reiser4 too? > Are these values stable reproducible? If you run this

Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2

On Monday 21 November 2005 19:06, E.Gryaznova wrote: > Hello. > > Hesse, Christian wrote: > >On Thursday 17 November 2005 18:22, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: > >>Hello > >> > >>Hesse, Christian wrote: > >>>Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: > Please try whether the attached patch improves anything. It

Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2

On Monday 21 November 2005 19:44, Hesse, Christian wrote: > On Monday 21 November 2005 19:06, E.Gryaznova wrote: > > Unfortunately we are not able to reproduce this slowdown. Would you > > please provide more info?: > > Is this 2.6.14-mm2 bad sync/fsync performance reproducible on fresh > > created

Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2

E.Gryaznova wrote (ao): > Unfortunately we are not able to reproduce this slowdown. Would you > please provide more info?: FWIW, I notice the same (I'm not the OP). My main workstation (Athlon) runs 2.6.15-rc1-mm1. Vim needs 4 to 12 seconds to close any file, mutt is very slow on sending email, ba

Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2

On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 21:50 +0100, Hesse, Christian wrote: > On Monday 21 November 2005 19:44, Hesse, Christian wrote: > > On Monday 21 November 2005 19:06, E.Gryaznova wrote: > > > Unfortunately we are not able to reproduce this slowdown. Would you > > > please provide more info?: > > > Is this 2.

Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2

Sander wrote: E.Gryaznova wrote (ao): Unfortunately we are not able to reproduce this slowdown. Would you please provide more info?: FWIW, I notice the same (I'm not the OP). My main workstation (Athlon) runs 2.6.15-rc1-mm1. Vim needs 4 to 12 seconds to close any file, mutt is very sl

Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2

On 11/22/05, E.Gryaznova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sander wrote: > > >E.Gryaznova wrote (ao): > Something like > for i in cfq noop anticipatory deadline > do > echo $i > /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler && cat > /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler && echo "foo" >/root/test && time vim +"s/ > foo/bar/

Collect data? (was: Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2)

E.Gryaznova wrote (ao): > Sander wrote: > ># echo "foo" > /boot/test > ># time vim +"s/foo/bar/" +"wq" /boot/test > >real0m0.016s > >user0m0.000s > >sys 0m0.000s > > > ># echo "foo" > /root/test > ># time vim +"s/foo/bar/" +"wq" /root/test > >real0m9.667s > >user0m0.000s > >sys

Re: Collect data? (was: Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2)

On Wednesday 23 November 2005 08:09, Sander wrote: > My 'good' system: > kernel: 2.6.15-rc1-mm2 > OS: Debian Sid > disks:4x sata on Promise > raid/lvm/etc: lmv stripe > > My 'bad' system: > kernel: 2.6.15-rc1-mm1 > OS: Debian Sid > dis

Re: Collect data? (was: Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2)

Hesse, Christian wrote (ao): > On Wednesday 23 November 2005 08:09, Sander wrote: > > My 'good' system: > > kernel: 2.6.15-rc1-mm2 > > OS: Debian Sid > > disks: 4x sata on Promise > > raid/lvm/etc: lmv stripe > > > > My 'bad' system: > > kernel: 2.