RE: .meta. as a Name Prefix

2004-04-22 Thread Alexander G. M. Smith
Burnes, James wrote on Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:10:00 -0600: In the same way that 'ls directory' is ambigous. Does it mean I want to look at the attributes of the directory itself, or does it mean that I'm referring to the contents of the directory? That's why they invented 'ls -d' Good analog.

Re: .meta. as a Name Prefix

2004-04-20 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alexander G. M. Smith wrote: | I agree, it needs to start with a period. I'd also drop the idea The namespace of beginning with one period is almost as full as that of no periods, as mentioned before. Our best bet for uniqueness is to call it

Re: .meta. as a Name Prefix

2004-04-20 Thread John D. Heintz
David Masover wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alexander G. M. Smith wrote: | I agree, it needs to start with a period. I'd also drop the idea The namespace of beginning with one period is almost as full as that of no periods, as mentioned before. Our best bet for