Gorazd Golob wrote (ao):
> On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 14:43 +, Robert Hulme wrote:
> > Can anyone give me a feel for how reliable you consider the Reiser 4
> > file system to be?
>
> I'm using it on my workstation for more than a year - for now without
> a problem.
> I guess for desktop system is s
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 14:43 +, Robert Hulme wrote:
> Can anyone give me a feel for how reliable you consider the Reiser 4
> file system to be?
>
> I installed it on my laptop awhile ago and it seemed ok (I removed it
> in the end as it was while you were having performance issues with it
> [or
Can anyone give me a feel for how reliable you consider the Reiser 4
file system to be?
I installed it on my laptop awhile ago and it seemed ok (I removed it
in the end as it was while you were having performance issues with it
[or rather with it interacting with some kernel change]).
I see a num
Yes, the older reiser4 was better. Well, let us hope a few weeks pass
and it all gets more stable, sigh.
Hans
On 11/26/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> has improved a lot since the VFS changes moved all the furniture to the
> left side of the room, but there are currently problems with NFS support.
>
> Hans
>
I've had 0 issues (well, if the interactivity problem isn't counted)
with amd64 and m
> has improved a lot since the VFS changes moved all the furniture to the
> left side of the room, but there are currently problems with NFS support.
I tried yesterday 2.6.14 with reiser4 patch from namesys, it's build into
the kernel as I use it for / so I didn't applied module patch, I had
oopse
has improved a lot since the VFS changes moved all the furniture to the
left side of the room, but there are currently problems with NFS support.
Hans
