On Tuesday 28 February 2006 22:19, Alec H. Peterson wrote:
Hi Hans,
On Feb 28, 2006, at 12:11, Hans Reiser wrote:
Please describe it in more detail.
Well, the error I'm getting is this:
Feb 21 13:10:22 ecbuild-10 kernel: WARNING: Flushing like mad: 16384
The C program I'm running to do
Hi Hans,
On Mar 1, 2006, at 8:27, Alexander Zarochentsev wrote:
All files created by the program below have zero lentgh, correct?
Is it the same program as which triggered 'flushing like mad' ?
Correct.
I would be happy to modify it and re-run it however you like. You
are correct though
Hi Alexander,
On Feb 26, 2006, at 13:42, Alexander Zarochentsev wrote:
Which kernel version and reiser4 patches were used?
2.6.15.4r4 kernel,
reiser4-for-2.6.15-1.patch
Is the system SMP?
Yes.
No, Flushing like mad usually indicates a bug.
Good to know.
Thanks!
Alec
Alec H. Peterson wrote:
Hi Alexander,
On Feb 26, 2006, at 13:42, Alexander Zarochentsev wrote:
Which kernel version and reiser4 patches were used?
2.6.15.4r4 kernel,
reiser4-for-2.6.15-1.patch
Is the system SMP?
Yes.
No, Flushing like mad usually indicates a bug.
Please
Hi Hans,
On Feb 28, 2006, at 12:11, Hans Reiser wrote:
Please describe it in more detail.
Well, the error I'm getting is this:
Feb 21 13:10:22 ecbuild-10 kernel: WARNING: Flushing like mad: 16384
The C program I'm running to do the test is this:
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
char
I meant for Zam to describe it in more detail, sorry about that. :-/
Hans
Alec H. Peterson wrote:
Hi Hans,
On Feb 28, 2006, at 12:11, Hans Reiser wrote:
Please describe it in more detail.
Well, the error I'm getting is this:
Feb 21 13:10:22 ecbuild-10 kernel: WARNING: Flushing like
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 22:11, Hans Reiser wrote:
Alec H. Peterson wrote:
Hi Alexander,
On Feb 26, 2006, at 13:42, Alexander Zarochentsev wrote:
Which kernel version and reiser4 patches were used?
2.6.15.4r4 kernel,
reiser4-for-2.6.15-1.patch
Is the system SMP?
Yes.
Alexander Zarochentsev wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 22:11, Hans Reiser wrote:
Alec H. Peterson wrote:
Hi Alexander,
On Feb 26, 2006, at 13:42, Alexander Zarochentsev wrote:
Which kernel version and reiser4 patches were used?
2.6.15.4r4 kernel,
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 22:56, Hans Reiser wrote:
Alexander Zarochentsev wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 22:11, Hans Reiser wrote:
Alec H. Peterson wrote:
Hi Alexander,
On Feb 26, 2006, at 13:42, Alexander Zarochentsev wrote:
Which kernel version and reiser4 patches were used?
Alexander Zarochentsev wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 22:56, Hans Reiser wrote:
Alexander Zarochentsev wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 22:11, Hans Reiser wrote:
Alec H. Peterson wrote:
Hi Alexander,
On Feb 26, 2006, at 13:42, Alexander Zarochentsev wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 23:42, Hans Reiser wrote:
Alexander Zarochentsev wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 22:56, Hans Reiser wrote:
Alexander Zarochentsev wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 22:11, Hans Reiser wrote:
Alec H. Peterson wrote:
Hi Alexander,
On Feb 26, 2006, at 13:42,
Hi all,
I have a scenario where large numbers of unlinks spread across 256
directories with 20,000 files in each directory results in these
kernel messages:
Feb 22 09:00:19 ecbuild-10 kernel: 4reiser4[umount(13646)]:
commit_current_atom (fs/reiser4/txnmgr.c:1092)[nikita-3176]:
Feb 22
12 matches
Mail list logo
