Theodore Tso wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:55:57AM -0500, David Masover wrote:
If I understand it right, the original Reiser4 model of file metadata is
the file-as-directory stuff that caused such a furor the last big push
for inclusion (search for Silent semantic changes in Reiser4):
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:55:57AM -0500, David Masover wrote:
If I understand it right, the original Reiser4 model of file metadata is
the file-as-directory stuff that caused such a furor the last big push
for inclusion (search for Silent semantic changes in Reiser4):
The furor was caused
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:26:55 +0100
Denis Vlasenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reiser4 thread seem to be longer than usual.
Meanwhile here's poor old me trying to find another four hours to finish
reviewing the thing.
Thanks Andrew.
The writeout code is ugly,
Hello
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 20:18 -0600, Hans Reiser wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
The writeout code is ugly, although that's largely due to a mismatch between
what reiser4 wants to do and what the VFS/MM expects it to do.
Yes. reiser4 writeouts atoms. Most of pages get into atoms via
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:24:37 +0400
Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The writeout code is ugly, although that's largely due to a mismatch
between
what reiser4 wants to do and what the VFS/MM expects it to do.
Yes. reiser4 writeouts atoms. Most of pages get into atoms via
Hello
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 07:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:24:37 +0400
Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The writeout code is ugly, although that's largely due to a mismatch
between
what reiser4 wants to do and what the VFS/MM expects it to do.
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Do you think that if reiser4 supported xattrs - it would increase its
chances on inclusion?
Probably the opposite.
If I understand it right, the original Reiser4 model of file metadata is
the file-as-directory stuff that caused such a furor the last big push
for
On 8/1/06, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:24:37 +0400
Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The writeout code is ugly, although that's largely due to a mismatch
between
what reiser4 wants to do and what the VFS/MM expects it to do.
Yes. reiser4
On 8/1/06, David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Do you think that if reiser4 supported xattrs - it would increase its
chances on inclusion?
Probably the opposite.
If I understand it right, the original Reiser4 model of file metadata is
the file-as-directory
Nate Diller wrote:
On 8/1/06, David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
I could be entirely wrong, though. I speak for neither
Hans/Namesys/reiserfs nor LKML. Talk amongst yourselves...
i should clarify things a bit here. yes, hans' goal is for there to
be no
10 matches
Mail list logo
