test
On Thursday 24 May 2007 01:07, Edward Shishkin wrote:
test
lists work
--
the liberation loophole will make it clear..
lex lyamin
--
the liberation loophole will make it clear..
lex lyamin
Test.
Hi,
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 17:07:16 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks wrote:
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 19:27:57 GMT, Danny Milosavljevic said:
Hi Edward,
I finally tried your cryptcompress setup (2.6.18-mm3) and just did the
first evil thing I could think of:
the reiser4 partition with ccreg40 enabled is
Hi Edward,
I finally tried your cryptcompress setup (2.6.18-mm3) and just did the
first evil thing I could think of:
the reiser4 partition with ccreg40 enabled is /dev/sda1 (/mnt/tmp/)
(mkfs'ed, thus empty).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /mnt/tmp/dannym/ du -m ~/doc/literatur
2609
tst
--
the liberation loophole will make it clear..
lex lyamin
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 01:23, Hans Reiser wrote:
Thanks Andrew, please be patient and persistent with us at this time, as
one programmer is on vacation, and the other is only able to work a few
hours a day due to an illness.
No problem. I'll post what I find to the list; the posts will
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 01:23, Hans Reiser wrote:
Thanks Andrew, please be patient and persistent with us at this time, as
one programmer is on vacation, and the other is only able to work a few
hours a day due to an illness.
No problem. I'll post what I find to the list; the posts will
)
f.seek(- options.regionsize + options.writeoffset,1)
f.write(writestr)
except KeyboardInterrupt:
os.unlink(scatteredwrites.%d.tmp % (os.getpid()))
==
Without fs load this stress test rarely causes problems. But with five
instances running in parallel with five
Thanks Andrew, please be patient and persistent with us at this time, as
one programmer is on vacation, and the other is only able to work a few
hours a day due to an illness.
Hans
which identical keys. Probably in your
test names are such that the problem did not come up yet on that amount
of files.
Here is the program I used below to test my theory. I echo out hello
10 times to each file to give some size. My linux distro is GENTOO
2006.0 version and I'm running kernel
in one directory. Can you explain collision more?Here
is the program I used below to test my theory. I echo out hello 10
times to each file to give some size. My linux distro is GENTOO 2006.0
version and I'm running kernel 2.16.15
#!/bin/bash LIMIT=1000 # Upper limit of 10 million filesecho echo
Hello
please ignore
--
the liberation loophole will make it clear..
lex lyamin
Vladimir,
I did another test, my typical dd and make, this time with kernel
2.6.10-rc2-mm2 and reiser4 mounted in sync mode. I'm still having
problems with bitmap.c. Details can be found at
http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/11-20-04/sync_mount/
Should I repeat the test
Hello,
Are you aware of the same kind of tool for SCSI disks ( i need one for an about to
die FUJITSU MAM3184 18Go 15K RPM disk)
Thanks,
Philippe
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:18:59 -0600
Lamont R. Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| You would need a tool for a low level format
| of the
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 18:12, Philippe Gramoull wrote:
Hello,
Are you aware of the same kind of tool for SCSI disks ( i need one for an about to
die FUJITSU MAM3184 18Go 15K RPM disk)
SpinRite also works for SCSI disks. Sorry, I do not have a URL. Google
for it.
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004
Hello,
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 18:18:06 -0600
Lamont R. Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Are you aware of the same kind of tool for SCSI disks ( i need one for an about
to die FUJITSU MAM3184 18Go 15K RPM disk)
|
| SpinRite also works for SCSI disks. Sorry, I do not have a URL.
Hallo,
I decided to test some days ago Kernel 2.6 with
Reiser4
on a laptop 3,8 Gb partition.
I installed Oracle 9.2 test DB (size: about 2 Gb ) and
wrote a script to insert 10 millions rows on a
tablespace.
Linux Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Oracle 9.2.0.4
Oracle test tablespace size: 300 Mb
access (or even CPU
usage -- they mostly wait for input). I can't test much else -- music
would not be noticeable except while ripping, and I haven't tried
gaming. The places that I see performance improvements are places like
tar, rsync (that /usr/portage dir gets rsynced every day
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:35:59AM +0100, Bernhard Sadlowski wrote:
I am using the attached stess.sh script (probably from this mailinglist)
for creating load on a reiserfs filesystem, which forks 100
(read,write,delete) processes:
# mkreiserfs /dev/sda4
# mount /dev/sda4 /backup
#
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 12:51:00PM +0100, Bernhard Sadlowski wrote:
Hm. This resembles me something.
Can you reproduce the same problem if you apply patches from
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/testing/quota-2.4.20/
These patches add quota support to reiserfs, but also
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 02:58:04PM +0300, Oleg Drokin wrote:
I will extract relevant bits from the patch though.
I will send you short version without quota once it will be ready.
Ok, here is the patch, can you give it a try and see if it also helps?
I tested it locally and it works
On 15 Jan 2003 18:01, Oleg Drokin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, here is the patch, can you give it a try and see if it also helps?
I tested it locally and it works for me.
If you confirm everything is ok, I will try to get it into 2.4.21 in time.
At first glance it seems to work. I will run now
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 04:48:52PM +0100, Bernhard Sadlowski wrote:
Ok, here is the patch, can you give it a try and see if it also helps?
I tested it locally and it works for me.
If you confirm everything is ok, I will try to get it into 2.4.21 in time.
At first glance it seems to
block allocation to be more random and cause less overhead
(verified).
And in this test we create a lot of 15k files.
Ok, I'll buy that. The only way to know for sure is to give it a try or
OF course you'll buy that, because my suggested workaround worked ;)
profile the run, but I think
test I've run so far, this is a speed gain for reiserfs, I'd love
to see further results.
This is one of the more experimental prereleases in 2.4.x, don't run it on
systems with important mail messages, source code, work files, homework,
love letters, tax records or anything else not found on your
is now backed by an address
space per device (made possible by Andrea's blkdev changes in 2.4.10), and
many cleanups were done by Linus and Al Viro.
In every test I've run so far, this is a speed gain for reiserfs, I'd love
to see further results.
This is one of the more experimental prereleases
buags wrote:
i installed reiserfs on my disk and the same file(s) are bigger on the
reisefs partition then a ext2
Did the files have holes, and did you use cp instead of tar? Did you account
for space used by the log?
Hans
Hi everyone,
I found this link to another filesystem comparison test. This is
interesting, in particular, because it features things like copy
performance between filesystems. It compares ReiserFS, XFS, JFS, ext2,
ext3, and vfat. In particular I'd like to find out what you think about
Christian Gottschalch wrote:
re All !
i've to set up a low coast filer(NFS-Server)on an dual
intel(866MHz) machine, an icp scsi raid controller, an
easyraid(HW-Raid with 250Gig) now i've to check some
filesystems(reiserfs,xfs,jfs,gfs...), how stable it works, performace etc. now i
need an
33 matches
Mail list logo
