I have added packaging for relax 1.3.0 to fink 10.4/10.5
unstable branch since there aren't any build instructions or
precompiled binaries for MacOS X. The relax-py package supports
building against either python 2.4 or python 2.5. The relax-py
package is installed with the command...
fink inst
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 05:10:30PM +0200, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the heads up. I didn't realise how many tests failed on a
> Mac! Most of these aren't too serious though and are due to different
> machine precision caused by the combination of a powerpc chip, Mac OS
> X, a
Edward,
I am trying to build updated relax-py packaging
for fink using the 1.3.4 release on x86_64 fink
with python2.6. Although your web page indicates
that the binaries available are built against
python 2.5 and 2.6, I am seeing build failures
when I try here with scons 1.2.0...
/sw/bin/pytho
Edward,
I have another question about the relax build system.
How does the relax build decide whether to use numeric
or numpy for its build with scons? In fink we have both
packages which coexist. However it is unclear if the
scons build automatically choices the newer package
(ie numpy 1.3.0) o
Edward,
Actually, I don't think the -bundle-loader approach will work
with python2.6 because it is linked against the libpython2.6 dylib
and not the static lib like python2.5. If you compare the symbols
returned fron "nm /sw/bin/python2.6" with "nm /sw/bin/python2.5",
the first case is a very s
ing or are from an old version. Do you
> know if this could be the issue, that the Python development packages
> are out of date or are missing?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Edward
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > Edward,
> > I am
compile the modules and run the system test
> > without failures? Also, once this is all functional, I would like to
> > get your changes (well, modified to be compatible with all other
> > operating systems) into the repository so that it is easier for you
> > next time.
>
o make this work
> (https://mail.gna.org/public/relax-devel/2006-11/msg00092.html), and
> then I tailored the scons script to match. If you cut an past this
> gcc command, can you compile the modules and run the system test
> without failures? Also, once this is all functional, I would like
n25 packages.
Jack
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 03:55:06PM +0200, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It could be, that Python 2.6 dynamically linked libraries are now
> compiled differently to earlier Python versions. I'll have to look
> that up as well. Would you
the
> linker" and see if that works. Or try gcc with the '-dynamiclib' flag
> (note that some of the other flags, although I'm not sure which, need
> to be removed). It could be quite possible that the Fink Python 2.6
> installation has removed the need for the bund
Edward,
Attached is the patch as applied to the tagged svn of relax 1.3.4
(I couldn't find the trunk svn). My other patches are specific to
packaging relax in fink. They concern the relocation of the relax
directories and suppression of the automatic compilation of the
python scripts (which for
;relax' file? If you are a
> developer, have multiple python versions installed, and would like to
> test this, this makes sense (but can be used by typing "python2.5
> relax --test-suite"). For a normal user though, I would assume that
> there would be one version
at 02:57:23PM +0100, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It might be worth talking with Jack Howarth (howarth att bromo dott
> med dott uc dott edu) as he is the maintainer of the relax fink
> packages. You can see our previous discussions about fink at:
>
> http://ww
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:57:23PM +0100, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It might be worth talking with Jack Howarth (howarth att bromo dott
> med dott uc dott edu) as he is the maintainer of the relax fink
> packages. You can see our previous discussions abou
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 04:46:43PM +0100, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This failure is because it takes 201 iterations to reach the minimum
> compared to 204 with x86_64 hardware. I have now removed this
> iteration check as testing the values and chi-squared number is
> sufficient to see t
Edward,
Thanks. I had to recreate a minfx-1.0.3.zip archive from
the contents of the svn and reuse the missing setup.py file
from the minfx-1.0.2.zip archive in order to build an updated
minfx-py26 package. Building the relax 1.3 branch under fink
(using the attached fink packaging files), I ge
Edward,
I can confirm that both x86_64 and i386 fink
produce relax-py26 packages from 1.3 branch svn
that completely pass the testsuite.
Jack
___
relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
This is the relax-users mailing list
relax-users@gna.org
Edward,
I forgot that to mention that I also needed to use this patch as well..
--- relax-1.3.5/sconstruct 2010-02-25 08:58:20.0 -0500
+++ relax-1.3.5.patched/sconstruct 2010-02-26 09:09:52.0 -0500
@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@
# Catch Mac OS X and send the correc
e code releases
> (http://www.nmr-relax.com/download.html#Source_code_release). These
> will require a bit more work. Unfortunately the person who was
> volunteering to keep relax up to date in fink, Jack Howarth, has been
> busy or has moved on to other things. I don't have a Ma
Edward,
I am in the process of updating the relax-py and relax packages in fink and
macports to the latest release. However I am seeing some oddities with the new
gui interface. In both cases, relax 1.3.13 and 1.3.14 exhibits a bug when
executed as 'relax --gui'. The gui interface window opens m
the build, when prompted, if that makes any difference.
Jack
ps I also have built relax 1.3.14 under fink but had to use the 2.9.3 release
of
wxPython because that is the only wxPython they have for python 2.7 in macports.
Have you tested relax against the wxPython 2.9.3 rele
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 07:55:22PM +0200, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you also copy and paste the full output of:
>
> $ relax --info
Done...
% relax --info
/sw/lib/python2.7/site-packages/wx-2.8-gtk2-unicode/wx/_core.py:14448:
UserWarning: wxPython/wxWidgets release number mismatc
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 08:06:31PM +0200, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Try the attached packaging placed in /sw/fink/10.4/local/main/finkinfo.
> > I don't
> > know how old your fink installation is. If it is rather old, you might want
> > to consider
> > a clean bootstrap following th
about creating huge dependency trees which cause
a lot of package to be built. Just building gnuplot is a mess.
>
>
> On 26 March 2012 20:16, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 08:06:31PM +0200, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
007/s10858-007-9214-2).
d'Auvergne, E. J. and Gooley, P. R. (2008). Optimisation of NMR dynamic models
II. A new methodology
for the dual optimisation of the model-free parameters and the Brownian
rotational diffusion tensor.
J. Biomol. NMR, 40(2), 121-133 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10858-007
ll be slow.
> >> I will probably need some time to debug relax using the old Mac gtk+
> >> version of the wx widgets, and will definitely release a new version
> >> (1.3.15) prior to that. So maybe it's safe to send out the newer
> >> relax versions to fin
to make this fail in my own hands. I'll play around and try to
> fix the wxGTK dock icon problem anyway. Is there a reason why the
> native Mac widgets are not being used with the fink version of
> wxPython?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Edward
>
>
> 2012/4/6 Jack Howarth
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:49:30PM +0200, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> See below:
>
>
> > Edward,
> > I am puzzled by the prebuilt Mac application for relax 1.3.14
> > on your site. It claims to contain ppc, i386 and x86_64 code
> > but that I only see...
> >
> > libwx_macud-2.8.0.dylib:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:38:17PM +0200, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've created a special task for attaching files (logs, errors,
> screenshots, etc) to at https://gna.org/task/index.php?7581. More
> below:
>
> >> I do not see the problem you are seeing, it's unfortunately not
> >> rep
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 09:55:51AM +0200, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> I've now fully tested the current relax 1.3 main line against the
> Python+wxGTK from fink, and everything works perfectly! The test
> suite passes without issue. In the process I removed a few small bugs
> affecti
ks perfectly.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Edward
Edward,
I can confirm that the gui issues are fixed in relax svn. Any idea
when the next release will occur?
Jack
>
>
> On 13 April 2012 15:28, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 09:55:51AM +0200, Edwar
The links for both the source tarballs at...
http://download.gna.org/relax/relax-3.1.1.src.tar.bz2
and
http://download.gna.org/relax/relax-3.1.1.src.zip
are missing the target files for the new release. FYI.
Jack
___
relax (http://
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:57:32PM -0600, Lisa Warner wrote:
> Hi Edward,
>
> Thank you for the quick reply. Here's a rundown of the things I've tried
> and what ended up working. I'm not sure what caused the problem -- I don't
> think it was Relax. In the end I uninstalled everything from macport
33 matches
Mail list logo
