Hello Nicolas,
Just to let you know as well, for the error analysis, if you have
duplicated spectra, you set them as duplicated, like you have done, but if
they are not, you need to get the RMSD noise value from Sparky (using
command 'rm'), and then put the value into the script as well, see below
Hello,
I've been trying to use the new 1.3.11, skipping straight from 1.3.9.
I've been having trouble with the dauvergne_protocol.py script. The
program doesn't seem to recognise this script like 1.3.9 does. The error
comes after reading the sequence, so I assume it must be when reading the
dat
Hi Edward,
Yes - what we did was made sure all the R2 experiments were mixed up so
that you wouldn't have any problem with sample heating (so 10 ms followed
by 1000 ms etc.). We also did two datasets for each of T1 and T2
experiment, alternating T1 and T2 datasets in order to compensate for
sampl
ject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Extracting results - eg sphere]
From:"Edward d'Auvergne"
Date: Thu, June 16, 2011 8:10 am
To: "Maddy Strickland"
Cc: relax-users@gna.org
--
Hi,
It is strange t
ect for individual
'sphere'/'prolate' etc. that haven't been chosen?
Maddy
Original Message
Subject: Re: Extracting results - eg sphere
From: "Edward d'Auvergne"
Date:Tue, June 1
Hello everyone,
I was wondering if there was a way to extract results, say just from the
spherical folder or just from the ellipsoid folder for example, displayed
as s2.txt, rex.txt etc. like with the final data extraction script, but
for a different model than is selected by the program?
Madele
ct line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of relax-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Binding studies (Maddy Strickland)
2. Re: ImporError (Edward d'Auvergne)
3. Re: Binding studies (Edward d'Auvergne)
4. Re: Binding studies (S
dward d'Auvergne"
"Maddy Strickland"
"relax-users@gna.org"
Sébastien M
--
Hi again,
One last comment:
Is the KD known ? If yes, than the population of bound complex c
Hi everyone,
I'm moving on to looking at dynamics of binding to a receptor which I've
already studied using Relax for Lipari-Szabo data. I was wondering if I
added some unlabelled peptide to the 15n receptor how I could study the
new relaxation data? Can I still use Relax and the same pulse sequ
Hi Edward,
I've been trying the new Relax 1.3.7, which has worked well for NOE and R1
calculations, but I'm struggling with the R2. Everything seems to work OK
until I get this...
-
relax> monte_carlo.setup(number=500)
relax> monte_carlo.creat
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [bug #17341] Compatibility with CCPN Analysis2.1
(fwd)]
From:"Edward d'Auvergne"
Date:Mon, January 10, 2011 9:51 am
To: "Maddy Strickland"
Cc:
or you to
> convert your old data to heights.
>
> Regards,
>
> Edward
>
>
> On 10 January 2011 11:50, Maddy Strickland
> wrote:
>> Hi Edward,
>>
>> I have sent an email to them, so it should get sorted out. I checked
>> the
>> numbers exporte
Hi Edward,
I've been using the 1.3.6. version of Relax today. It is excellent at
recognising the Analysis2.1 Sparky formatted files now, thank you Edward,
but I thought I might try using my old lists and changing the int_method
function in Relax curve fit from 'height' to 'volume' (as they were v
Hi Jo,
Thanks for that, you're right is it exporting the volume rather than the
peak height. I definitely will email them as this error has undone about
a year's worth of work for me! I suppose it will be quicker the second
time round though. Looking forwards to recalculating T1, T2, NOE and
Li
next week as I have brand new
data which I can put up there.
Maddy Strickland
ps - I'm sorry to hear about your very seasonal 'elf class' problem!
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:27:14 +0100
From: "Edward d'Auvergne"
Subje
Relax, so you have to change every line to
A1649N-HN
which is a bit of a pain. I really like using Analysis for peak picking
and it would be a shame to change. Would it be easier to use another
program, which doesn't have so many compatibility issues?
Maddy
16 matches
Mail list logo
