Re: Using modified all models free

2016-11-11 Thread Edward d'Auvergne
On 1 November 2016 at 22:12, Mahdi, Sam wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I had a quick question regarding running the single model free run (m4). > For some proteins we only have data at only one field strength, so I know I > can't use the d'Auvergene protocol (needs a

Re: relax-users Digest, Vol 116, Issue 38

2016-11-11 Thread Edward d'Auvergne
On 29 October 2016 at 23:44, Mahdi, Sam wrote: > Hi Edward, > > I was reading the theory on model free within the manual and I had a quick > question. The d'Auvergne protocol, is that the model-free analysis in > reverse with the universal solution? Yes, that is the

Re: Dispersion Back Calculation

2016-11-11 Thread Edward d'Auvergne
On 27 October 2016 at 18:10, Jeremy Anderson wrote: > Hi Edward and Troels, > > Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. I had dug around a bit in > the test_suite directory but wanted to make sure I was looking in the right > place before I descended into the rabbit

Re: Using Model-free models

2016-11-11 Thread Mahdi, Sam
Hi Edward, So there is no point in running model-free unless you have data at 2 field strengths? I also had a slight side question. I've read your papers on the diffusion seeded paradigm, and dynamic models 1 and 2. I understand the importance of the diffusion tensor value, and understand how the