On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 10:18 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
> Bastien:
>
> I was not trying to suggest that there was no GNOME portability
> documentation. Instead I was saying that it should not be
> surprising that non-Linux distros (and many popular Linux distros)
> are making very slow progress w
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 14:17 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> As a developer (and working for an OS vendor), I *do* want more OS
> vendors to step up and intensify their participation in the project.
> Yes, more participation from several different OS vendors might slow
> down feature development a bit
David:
On 10/22/12 01:17 PM, David Zeuthen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Brian Cameron wrote:
Right. So, you probably are not surprised that things are moving along
slowly either. :)
Actually I'm quite excited about the development pace for GNOME
nowadays - there are lots of coo
Hey,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Brian Cameron wrote:
> Right. So, you probably are not surprised that things are moving along
> slowly either. :)
Actually I'm quite excited about the development pace for GNOME
nowadays - there are lots of cool *user-visible* features landing in
new relea
David:
On 10/22/12 01:01 PM, David Zeuthen wrote:
But please don't expect others to port GNOME to run on your OS.
I was never suggesting that any others do any sort of port for anyone.
I was only highlighting that the lack of documentation makes things
slow. I am sure that we can improve the
Hey,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Brian Cameron wrote:
> I have heard about this "couple of hours". Is it even possible to
> build the GNOME stack in 2 hours if you run into no problems?
That's not the point. The point is that adapting GNOME to some OS such
as Solaris, Fedora, Ubuntu, OpenB
David:
On 10/22/12 11:50 AM, David Zeuthen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Brian Cameron
wrote:
You are talking about shipping a *complete* and *free* (libre *and*
gratis) graphical desktop environment and you're complaining that you
have to spend a couple of hours *reviewing* the co
Hey,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Brian Cameron
wrote:
> Most readers would likely need
> to review the code to understand what specific power features are
> actually being described here or why they might need logind. Most
> rows in the table are like this, so this matrix is only a very
>
Bastien:
I was not trying to suggest that there was no GNOME portability
documentation. Instead I was saying that it should not be
surprising that non-Linux distros (and many popular Linux distros)
are making very slow progress with GNOME 3 based on the quality
and scope of the existing documen
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 11:00 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I intend on making systemd a hard requirement for the power plugin in
> gnome-settings-daemon. There is a lot of interactions and external
> factors involved in making policy decision about power. This makes the
> power plugin
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 11:00 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I intend on making systemd a hard requirement for the power plugin in
> gnome-settings-daemon. There is a lot of interactions and external
> factors involved in making policy decision about power. This makes the
> power plugin
11 matches
Mail list logo
