Re: Freeze break request for libgnomekbd

2016-09-14 Thread Rui Tiago Cação Matos
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Who wants to make a new release? Can you take it Rui? Yes, incoming. Thanks for the acks! Rui ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: Freeze break request for libgnomekbd

2016-09-14 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 15:39 +0200, Rui Tiago Cação Matos wrote: > I'm including all the other cleanups in this request since they're > trivial enough and libgnomekbd hasn't had a release since 3.6.0 . Who wants to make a new release? Can you take it Rui? Michael

Re: Freeze break request for mutter

2016-09-14 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 09:21 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > Those patches all look good to me. In particular the rotation fix is > important to claim Wayland feature-completeness, so +1 from me for > the > release team. +2 ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: Freeze break request for libgnomekbd

2016-09-14 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 09:49 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > +1 from me. r-t approval 2 of 2. And likely irrelevant; just pointing out: https://git.gnome.org/browse/libgnomekbd/commit/?h=wip/rtcm/cleanups=3f4de28962fa73fdc784c8b4057128b195b5c06c states "It's not needed with modern gtk+" (to be

Re: Freeze break request for libgnomekbd

2016-09-14 Thread Matthias Clasen
+1 from me. ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Freeze break request for libgnomekbd

2016-09-14 Thread Rui Tiago Cação Matos
Hi, I'd like to request a freeze break request for libgnomekbd to include this set of small patches https://git.gnome.org/browse/libgnomekbd/log/?h=wip/rtcm/cleanups in particular, these two:

Re: Freeze break request for mutter

2016-09-14 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to request freeze breaks for 5 (five) Wayland related bugs. > > One is a feature bug fix, one avoids possibly aborting valid (GTK+) > clients, and three are crash fixes. I'm listing them below: > > Fix output

Re: Code freeze exception for Evolution

2016-09-14 Thread Frederic Peters
Hi Tomas, > I'd like to request a code freeze expection for [0]. Without this > change the email printing in Evolution does not work at all. The patch > was approved by Milan Crha. 1/2. (ideally you'd also fix the typo pointed by Andre in the bug report). Fred

Code freeze exception for Evolution

2016-09-14 Thread Tomas Popela
Hi, I'd like to request a code freeze expection for [0]. Without this change the email printing in Evolution does not work at all. The patch was approved by Milan Crha. Thank you Tom [0] - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771420 ___