HELP_STRING([--enable-strict],
[Enable strict compilation options]), enable_strict=$enableval,
enable_strict=$default_strict)
if test x$enable_strict != xno; then
CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED
-DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED
2011/6/17 Olav Vitters :
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 06:12:48PM +0100, Javier Jardón wrote:
>> On 17 June 2011 17:28, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> >
>> > 3.1.2 != last minute... its an early snapshot, after all, so things
>
> I meant before 3.1.2 release. But ye
> 31/8 1/9
> Fred × ×
> andre × ×
Javier x-
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
At the same time it's a format change from a bitmap PNG to
> a scalable SVG (even though nothing gets scaled currently).
>
+1 from me too
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/releas
uot;, if you do not want to use the standard "audio-input-microphone"
[1]
http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-naming-spec/icon-naming-spec-latest.html
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
> Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
>
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
On 2 September 2011 17:47, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>>
>> No objections for the docs, provided the end result matches
>> these mockups (give or take some pixels). If it's different,
>> please provide screenshots.
>>
>
> In that case, +1 of 2 for the release
; to "All Topics" and then adds a few choice
>> topics underneath.
>>
>> Adding menu items is a UI change, I guess, so I need release team
>> approval. There's no docs team objection, of course.
>
> Ping? It'd be nice to have this in before I have to also
at these strings will be displayed to the end-user and these new
> ones are more appropiate than before.
+1 from me (Release Team)
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
n screen. This was added for site administrators to
> brand their lab machines, and distros also use it to add branding. We
> don't want to show any sort of logo by default, so this one would only
> get shown after changing a gsettings key.
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bu
it to "yellow", ie
AM_MAINTAINER_MODE -> AM_MAINTAINER_MODE([enable])
Thanks for you collaboration.
[1] http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2011/09/08/am_maintainer_mode-is-not-cool/
[2] http://people.gnome.org/~fpeters/reports/maintainer-mode.html
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
On 20 September 2011 02:28, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> This time to not crash on systems with systemd installed but where
> systemd isn't the init system (apparently possible on Arch Linux).
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659367
2/2 from RT
--
Javi
or we could go with both. Your choice.
>
> In general, I think gnome-control-center should definitely be fixed
> because GLib can only really ever do heuristics at best, and
> gnome-control-center should be more robust against other random things
> that people might put in their
the date as
>> folks stores times in UTC.
>>
>> OK to commit?
>
> +1.
looks fine: 2 / 2
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
he patch looks correct to me, +1.
R-T approval 2 / 2
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
t; caribou patch:
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659867
>>
>
> I've tested these, they make the on-screen keyboard a lot more reliable. +1
>
Same here, 2 / 2 from RT
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
hen you move the pointer into the keyboard).
>>>
>>
>> Are you going to address Marina's comments there, or just commit the
>> patch as is for 3.2 and revisit it later ?
>
> I'm going to merge in her suggestion.
Go ahead then, 2/2 from RT
--
Javier Jard
nt a11y-related blocker where the login
> screen sometimes freezes after hitting enter in the password entry.
Seems to work ok here: +1
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Releas
ested
> this on my machine, and where it would previously hang 100%, I got 10
> successful logins in 10 attempts with this patch. Mike independently
> came up with the same fix.
Seems to work ok here: +1
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
idered as
>> harmful, especially if you enjoy using your computer naked. :)
>
> I'll suppose you tested it appropriately and give you my +1 on it.
>
2/2
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/ma
h. But it can't make things worse, really. There's no
>> way to login right now if you built gdm without split authentication. So
>> it feels wrong to wait for 3.2.1, imho.
>
> The patch fixes the issue.
+1 from me, then
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
ot;, "Hide
> Text").
+1 from me, thanks for complete this for 3.2.1
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
× × ×
>
> Andre - - × × × ×
Javier-xx x --
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-tea
#x27;gnome-apps-3.4'
Thanks
On behalf of the release-team,
Javier Jardón
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
eek?
>>
Hi,
fredp elleuca jjardon
12 × x
13 x
14 x
15 × x
16 × x
I do not have problems the 12 or 14 if the meeting ends before 19:00
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
_
>
> Would anyone have any objections?
No complains, so libxklavier 5.2 is available in the modulesets now
Regards
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
x
>> > 6 x x
>> > 7 × ×
>> > 8 × × x x
>> > 9 x x
>> > 10 × × x
>> > 11 × × x
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
The branch 'gnome-3-4' was created pointing to:
168d747... release: post-release bump to 3.4.2
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
on bugzilla.
They are little changes and make sense: 1/2 from the release team
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Hello Luis,
I wonder if would be possible a new release of zenity. The last one
was 3.2.0 and there are lots of translation updates in git.
If you are out of time I'd happy to help you making a new release
Regards
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
re
gt; despite the string changes.
As you said the master branch has more translations, and the UI/string
changes between master and gnome-3-4 are minimal.
1/2 from the release team
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/m
672474
>
> Matthias and I debugged it on IRC today and he recommend I request a
> code freeze break for it.
The patch is small and is already tested by 2 developers, 1/2 from the
release team
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http
bad. Patchin
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672547 fixes it, permission
> to commit before 3.4.
The patch is simple and fixes and quite important bug. 1/2 from the r-t
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail
hanks for considering,
> Cosimo
Minimal patches that fix critical bugs, go ahead
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
any regressions.
>
> User documentation does not seem to be affected (according to [1]).
>
> r-t approval 1 of 2 for the patches.
>
r-t approval 2 of 2 for the patches.
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mai
ed), release team approval 1 of 2.
Go for it, release team approval 2 of 2.
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
>>
>> Patch is pretty simple and safe.
>
> release-team approval 1 of 2.
Go for it, release-team approval 2 of 2.
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
r enters
>> their password instead of creating a new session.
>>
>> Details and patch here:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672630
>>
>> good to commit?
>
> Looks good to me, +1 / 2 for the release team
OK, 2/2 for the release team
-
gpk_dbus_task_dbus_return_value (dtask, TRUE);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>>
>> /* don't use a bullet for one item */
>
> release-team approval 1 of 2 (for the updated patch).
2/2 approval from the r-t
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
On 22 March 2012 23:29, Robert Ancell wrote:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672639
Trivial patch, 2/2 from r-t (1/2 in the bug by Andre)
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rele
ched in the bug.
Tiny patch that fix a crash, 1/2 from the r-t
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
ode paths are often taken (especially the 1st one).
>>
>> Is it OK to commit those 2 patches?
>
> approval 1 of 2 for the release team.
2/2 from the R-T
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailma
second patch, the first one doesn't change the
>> semantic of the code.
>
> Ah, at first I didn't understand that both patches are needed. :)
>
> r-t approval 1 of 2 for the two patches.
r-t approval 2 of 2
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
_
trusted svg files.
1/2 from the release team
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
>>
>> http://fpaste.org/0Tfk/
>>
>> I have confirmed locally that the patch fixes the issue.
>>
>
> Approval 1 of 2 for the release team.
Approval 2 of 2 for the release team.
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
rel
1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672809
Aproval 1/2 for the R-T
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
The branch 'gnome-3-4' was created.
Summary of new commits:
08d4b81... GNOME 3.4 modulesets
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
we make off of our cogl-1.10 branch for now.
Thanks Robert.
I already created the cogl-1.10 module in the 3.6 modulesets [1] so
you can still use cogl for master (2.0) development
Regards
[1]
http://git.gnome.org/browse/jhbuild/commit/?id=4e451a2ba19fa103840b7a22879b026ca24269fa
--
Jav
✔
>> Andre | ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
>> Colin |
>> Frederic | ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
>> Javier |✔ ✔ ✔
>> Kjartan |
>> Luca |
>> Matthias | ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
>> Olav |
--
that this will be
the version supported and used in GNOME 3.6
Regards,
[1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622871
[2] https://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/NewDocumentationInfrastructure
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
/comment):
* Features progress
* GnomeGoals progress
* nautilus recent discussions
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in
Hello Maciej,
As some GNOME modules are starting to port to libgee 0.8, Id like to
ask you what is the status of this module. Do you plan to have a
stable 0.8 release for GNOME 3.6 (September)?
Thanks
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
GNOME Release Manager
n
[1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679587
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
gt; Matthias | OK Only at 18:00
> Olav | OK OK
So, lets meet on wednesday at 18:00
Regards
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
27;use gnome-autogen' ?
Do not check for specific versions of automake in autogen.sh, but
require the minimum version in AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE macro in configure.ac
Do you have a list of these modules so we can fix them?
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
On 28 July 2012 20:22, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Andre Klapper wrote:
>> According to
>> http://git.gnome.org/browse/releng/tree/tools/schedule/3.6.schedule
>> we need to assign the next releases.
>>
>> Please add your name in case that you have time:
>>
>> Aug 06
ded to carry on taking a look to
possible regression and also request a explanation of the future plans
to the developers.
Lets try to do better next time and try that maintainers
announce/propose big changes during Feature phase.
Regards
--
Javier Jardón C
riting of release notes begins
>
> Noone volunteered to handle 3.5.90, it's still time :)
Luca did:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2012-August/msg9.html
Cheers
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mai
g/show_bug.cgi?id=670995
>>> [3] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677050
>>> [4]
>>> https://github.com/gnome-design-team/gnome-mockups/blob/master/documents/documents-device-actions.png
>
> +1 of 2 for the release team
2/2 for release team
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
he current control-center:
> 682999 Updates to 'Change the desktop background'
> 683000 Updates to 'Automatically lock your screen'
> 683002 Updates to 'Change which language you use'
> 683003 Updates to '
ng that Allan wanted since a while.
>
> On the other hand that's a not trivial change and we are already pretty
> late in the cycle so I'd understand if you'd decide to postpone it for
> 3.7; you call, really.
1/2 from r
ved by design team and maintainers, lets try to
get this in .91
+ 1 / 2 from release team
Cheers
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
s the freeze.
>> >
>>
>> I've looked over the patches, and they looked ok to me, so +1 of 2 for
>> the release team.
>
> Any taker for a second ack? ;) I'd like to get this in for today's release.
Seems not very intrusive, 2/2 from r-t
--
Javier J
e'd
> and does not affect existing API; since we're still very early in the
> freeze, I'll give my +1, wait for a second one and then it will be ok
> to push the fix.
2/2 for release team
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-
t; The design is a simplification of current dialog so it is well-arranged.
> It also uses asynchronous methods instead of synchronous ones so it is
> more responsive.
>
> I've put quite a lot of testing into it over past weeks.
Trust you in this point. 1/2
e connected.
>>
>> It adds two strings (a label and a button). If that's good with you,
>> I'll merge it for 3.6.
>>
>
> Looks fine to me if the translators are ok with the new strings, +1/2
> for the release team.
The change
://live.gnome.org/Smoketesting
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
bably include
>> gnome-i18n - those are new translatable strings, I guess ?
>> I'll make sure we get a .1 release for it, if required.
>
> There are no new strings, the messages come from libpam or gdm and are
> already translated.
Great, 2/2 for r-t
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
user menu.
>>
>> http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=223834
>>
>> Specifically, the patch removes the ellipses and changes "Shut Down"
>> to "Power Off".
>
> If it's exactly in line, that should be tri
api break),
Evolution fails to build.
The fix is already available in evolution git repository, so expect a
working tarball for 3.5.92.
For a more detailed list of known and relevant bugs, see our blocker
bugs list for 3.6 on bugzilla:
http://goo.gl/kgj2h
Hope you enjoy it
--
Javier Jard
d, so It should easy to bisect
if there is some regression.
1/2 for release team
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683831
Very visible bug, nice to have this fixed
1/2 for release team
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
K with it.
>>
>
> Both of these look fine to me. +1 for the release team.
Both patches are small and fix an important visual issue
2/2 for r-t
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
for more advanced filtering.
>
> The patch is available on the bug and introduces a bunch of new
> (short) strings. I think this would add a good extra polish for
> Nautilus 3.6.
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683722
A bit late in the cycle, but see
rings and replaces then with 1.
>
> The strings reside in gnome-online-accounts even though they actually show up
> in gnome-control-center.
>
> Sorry for the confusion.
2/2 for release team
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnom
quot;Color:".
>
> Looks entirely fine to me, so r-t approval 1/2. CC'ing gnome-i18n, who
> primarily need to know.
yeah, 2/2 for r-t
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
> strictly affect UI freeze or feature freeze, because it probably
>> deserves a mention in the release notes.
>> As hard code freeze is impending, if it's ok I'm planning to push this
>> roughly tomorrow afternoon (UTC).
>
> This gets a +1 for the release team fr
!
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
GNOME Release Team
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
ll extension was providing previously,
> feature-wise. It is one of the remaining 'high-priority' issues for
> the input sources feature.
>
> I've checked the release-notes: we don't have a screenshot of this menu.
>
> The patch has been tested by Takao as well.
>> Sounds good, and the patches look fine to me.
2/2 for release team
> Sigh. Pushed those whilst fixing
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684309
> Let me know whether I should revert.
I dont think is a problem, but if you need a r-t aproval, 1/2 from me
--
Javi
On 21 September 2012 05:21, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Patches are at:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684490
>
> Matthias marked it as a blocker, and so it is fixed.
1/2 for release team
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-te
gle.
>
> Let me know what you think.
> ___
> release-team@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
> Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
I'd like to commit it:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684487
>
> Ok ?
Sure, +1
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
and the code is in
>>
>> #ifdef WITH_CONSOLE_KIT
>>
>> #endif
>>
>> guards, so it's really specific to consolekit.
>
> +1 of 2 from me, then.
Important bug, 2/2
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-
requesitng a
> freeze break for him. Opinions ?
Seems a small and safe, +1
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
___
> release-team@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
> Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
ew more
>>> cycles getting the most out of it.
>>
>> Thanks for the testing and comments. I've attached new patches in the bug.
>>
>
> After some more refinements, these patches are good to go in, as far
> as I am concerned.
> They work fine in my testing.
>
/listinfo/release-team
> Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
On 24 September 2012 12:29, Javier Jardón wrote:
> Go for it, +1
Also, why not remove the gtk_menu_button_set_menu() function from
GTK+, if it didnt hit any stable release...
> On 24 September 2012 12:19, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> The new GtkMenuButton widget has a gtk_menu_but
On 24 September 2012 12:32, Javier Jardón wrote:
> On 24 September 2012 12:29, Javier Jardón wrote:
>> Go for it, +1
>
> Also, why not remove the gtk_menu_button_set_menu() function from
> GTK+, if it didnt hit any stable release...
Nevermind, this is just what you want to
shipping the shell in the
> current state where toggling the osk switch is almost guaranteed to
> leave you with a stuck grab and an unusable desktop is an option.
>
> Therefore, I'm in favour of accepting these patches.
Yeah, +1
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
ave caught it before :-)
>>
>
> Looks good to me, and as you say it should be very safe.
> Approval 1 for the release team.
>
> I'll roll a 3.6.0.1 when this is in.
2/2 , go for it
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-te
i18n team for the string change ?
>
> Wish granted: 2/2 i18n approval.
>
> Cheers,
>
>> > Regards
>> > Gabor Kelemen
>> ___
>> gnome-i18n mailing list
>> gnome-i...@gnome.org
>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
>
>
> --
> Gil Forcada
>
> [ca] guifi.net - una xarxa lliure que no para de créixer
> [en] guifi.net - a non-stopping free network
> bloc: http://gil.badall.net
> planet: http://planet.guifi.net
>
> ___
> release-team@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
> Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
e in behavior so I don't see any problems with the user docs.
>
> r-t approval 1 of 2.
2/2
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
✔ ✔ ✔ ? -
>> > > Colin |
>> > > Frederic | ✔ - - ✔ ✔ ✔
>> > > Javier| ✔ ✔ ✔
>> > > Kjartan | ✔ ✔
clocks to the meta-gnome-apps-tested module. Any
> objections ?
Fine with me
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
ation, PrintToFile, Python3Porting,
> DesktopFileKeywords, HighContrastAppIcons as 3.8 goals
I think its a good plan
Also Id like to add a GnomeGoal to stop using x11 specific api,
so prepare GNOME for future use of wayland for example.
Any objection on this?
Regards
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
same time ? Or what is the
>> next possible time for everybody ?
Id would prefer Sunday if possible
Regards
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
proceed to
fix all the GNOME modules to avoid future breakages
Thanks for you collaboration.
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autotools-announce/2012-09/msg0.html
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailma
ation about 3.7, the full schedule, the official
module lists and the proposed module lists, please see our colorful 3.7 page:
http://www.gnome.org/start/unstable
For a quick overview of the GNOME schedule, please see:
http://live.gnome.org/Schedule
Thanks,
--
Javier
1 - 100 of 332 matches
Mail list logo
