Re: Evolution 3.5.90 vs WebKit 1.9.90

2012-08-27 Thread Luca Ferretti
2012/8/27 Piñeiro : >>> Any idea/suggestion? >> So in other words this is another webkitgtk 1.9.x API break? > I asked a little about that, and webkitgtk people told me that they > already clarified this on webkit-gtk list. So about that: OK, better now than later :) I suppose meanwhile we could

Re: Evolution 3.5.90 vs WebKit 1.9.90

2012-08-27 Thread Piñeiro
On 08/24/2012 08:24 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 18:46 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote: >> here I'm for the the usual release issue with evolution :) This time >> we have a problem building against WebKit, i.e. >> >> * empathy and epiphany need freshly released webkit 1.9.90 >>

Re: Evolution 3.5.90 vs WebKit 1.9.90

2012-08-24 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 18:46 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote: > here I'm for the the usual release issue with evolution :) This time > we have a problem building against WebKit, i.e. > > * empathy and epiphany need freshly released webkit 1.9.90 > * evolution fails to build against webkit 1.9.90, se

Evolution 3.5.90 vs WebKit 1.9.90

2012-08-24 Thread Luca Ferretti
Hi Mattew, here I'm for the the usual release issue with evolution :) This time we have a problem building against WebKit, i.e. * empathy and epiphany need freshly released webkit 1.9.90 * evolution fails to build against webkit 1.9.90, see [1] Any idea/suggestion? I suspect the best is ign