Re: Revised Release Schedule

2007-09-05 Thread Cornelius Schumacher
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 15:17, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > KDE SDK Release > = > The KDE Software Development Kit contains all the bits and pieces needed > for developing KDE4 applications. This includes kdesupport, kdelibs, > kdepimlibs and kdebase/runtime. The term SDK is

Re: Revised Release Schedule

2007-09-05 Thread Allen Winter
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 9:17:11 am Sebastian Kügler wrote: > Here's a proposal for a revised release schedule, taking into account comment > by various people over the last week. Especially Dirk being on vacation and > the release date being to close to Christmas are major flaws in the cur

Revised Release Schedule

2007-09-05 Thread Sebastian Kügler
Here's a proposal for a revised release schedule, taking into account comment by various people over the last week. Especially Dirk being on vacation and the release date being to close to Christmas are major flaws in the current schedule. I've removed beta4 since otherwise it all gets too clos

Re: Release dates/nomenclature

2007-09-05 Thread Dirk Mueller
On Sunday, 2. September 2007, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote: > Probably i'm not the first one to say that, but the current issues have > NOTHING TO DO with tools like krazy, but to lack of we do better management > of project and failing in to explain to out developers what we need to do > right

Re: Release dates/nomenclature -- Revised proposal

2007-09-05 Thread Dirk Mueller
On Tuesday, 4. September 2007, Cornelius Schumacher wrote: > > The libs release should include kdesupport, kdelibs, and kdepimlibs > Shouldn't it also include kdebase/runtime, so that it provides everything > what is needed for third-party apps development? Yes, kdebase/runtime should not be forg

Re: Release dates/nomenclature

2007-09-05 Thread Dirk Mueller
On Monday, 3. September 2007, Thomas Zander wrote: > so shutting down at least the discovery of bugs that are not relevant in > this phase of development (freeze and all) makes sense, and can be > explained to people under the guise of; what use is it to report bugs > that you shouldn't be fixing

Re: Release dates/nomenclature -- Revised proposal

2007-09-05 Thread Torsten Rahn
> October 22, 2007: Tagging Beta4 (Again, a Monday) > October 30 2007: Release Beta4 (Beta4 is only 2 weeks long) Having a Beta for two weeks long makes no sense. Betas are made to get feedback from the people who are meant to test the beta release. Subtract 8 days for packaging from the 2 week