Re: [24h] 6 months release schedule, 4.1 in July

2008-01-16 Thread Richard Moore
On 1/17/08, Sebastian Kuegler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now it'd be time for people with *strong* objections to give them, otherwise, we should start communicating the new schedule. Not an objection, but we need to consider that a number of things in plasma are going to need Qt 4.4 to meet their

Re: [24h] 6 months release schedule, 4.1 in July

2008-01-16 Thread Sebastian Kuegler
On Thursday 17 January 2008 01:27:48 Richard Moore wrote: On 1/17/08, Sebastian Kuegler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now it'd be time for people with *strong* objections to give them, otherwise, we should start communicating the new schedule. Not an objection, but we need to consider that a

Re: [24h] 6 months release schedule, 4.1 in July

2008-01-16 Thread Matt Rogers
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:14:28AM +0100, Sebastian Kuegler wrote: So I went through the recent emails regarding the release schedule. Since the discussion has fallen silent, I think pretty much everything has been said. My impression from re-reading all those emails is that most people would

Re: [24h] 6 months release schedule, 4.1 in July

2008-01-16 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Donnerstag 17 Januar 2008 schrieb Matt Rogers: On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:14:28AM +0100, Sebastian Kuegler wrote: So I went through the recent emails regarding the release schedule. Since the discussion has fallen silent, I think pretty much everything has been said. My impression from

Re: [24h] 6 months release schedule, 4.1 in July

2008-01-16 Thread Kevin Ottens
Le jeudi 17 janvier 2008, Stephan Kulow a écrit : Just in case you care: openSUSE would have a problem with September Doesn't it have a problem with July also? Well, at least 11.0 is announced for June 19, but maybe it's not set in stone. Regards. -- Kévin 'ervin' Ottens,