Op Tuesday 25 March 2008 16:56 schreef u:
> But maybe I have a weird logic, and everything is beautiful and nice how
> it is.
No, it is a mess, but by making another branch, the mess gets bigger, not less
;-)
Remember that we could not use kdesupport/qca trunk to compile kde trunk just
before
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Tom Albers wrote:
> I just don't see the need, if the kdesupport authors request it, it's
> a totally different discussion though.
Where are kdesupport apps developed? In /trunk/kdesupport? In other svn
servers? Again why do we keep it here, if it is how you said? Or why
At Tuesday 25 March 2008 16:27, you wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Tom Albers wrote:
> > To be able to ship 4.0 to the customers distro's /must/ have version
> > of all the dependencies of KDE4. Including the ones which live in
> > kdesupport. How else can they ship it?
>
> I'm not seeing how
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Tom Albers wrote:
> To be able to ship 4.0 to the customers distro's /must/ have version
> of all the dependencies of KDE4. Including the ones which live in
> kdesupport. How else can they ship it?
I'm not seeing how this is relevant. If you want to develop or test a
dev
At Tuesday 25 March 2008 15:59, you wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Mark Constable wrote:
> > I can imagine this is why kdesupport came into
> > being in the first place, something that can be reliably fetched
> > automatically with standard tools.
>
> Exactly, this is my idea. If you want to
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Mark Constable wrote:
> I can imagine this is why kdesupport came into
> being in the first place, something that can be reliably fetched
> automatically with standard tools.
Exactly, this is my idea. If you want to build trunk, you use kdesupport
from trunk and you can
On 2008-03-25 22:07, Tom Albers wrote:
> > > I think it is the responsibility of the kdesupport library maintainer
> > > to clearly indicate which released version of their library should be
> > > used to compile branch and trunk. So I'm against branching, tagging
> > > or releasing.
> >
> > But
At Tuesday 25 March 2008 12:45, you wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Tom Albers wrote:
> > I think it is the responsibility of the kdesupport library maintainer
> > to clearly indicate which released version of their library should be
> > used to compile branch and trunk. So I'm against branching
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Tom Albers wrote:
> > I think it is the responsibility of the kdesupport library maintainer
> > to clearly indicate which released version of their library should be
> > used to compile branch and trunk. So I'm against branc
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Tom Albers wrote:
> I think it is the responsibility of the kdesupport library maintainer
> to clearly indicate which released version of their library should be
> used to compile branch and trunk. So I'm against branching, tagging
> or releasing.
But then, why do we hav
At Tuesday 25 March 2008 12:00, you wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > On Friday 21 March 2008, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > > as of now, kdesupport is not branched (except for 3.5), nor it is
> > > tagged. This can cause confusion as see on this thread:
> > > http://lists.kde.
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Friday 21 March 2008, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > as of now, kdesupport is not branched (except for 3.5), nor it is
> > tagged. This can cause confusion as see on this thread:
> > http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-devel&m=120587525306937&w=2
>
> one should
On Friday 21 March 2008, Andras Mantia wrote:
> as of now, kdesupport is not branched (except for 3.5), nor it is
> tagged. This can cause confusion as see on this thread:
> http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-devel&m=120587525306937&w=2
one shouldn't use kdesupport. preferably one should use the releas
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Allen Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2008 10:44:45 David Faure wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 March 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 19 March 2008 03:52:14 Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
> > > > Le Monday 17 March 2008 12:36:17 pm Ca
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Anne-Marie Mahfouf
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Monday 17 March 2008 12:36:17 pm Carlo, vous avez écrit :
>
>
> > Hi,
> > I've added the emoticons kcm to kdereview some weeks ago, it's very
> > simple you can add/edit/remove emoticons theme
> >
> > Carlo
>
>
On Monday 17 March 2008 14:05:33 David Faure wrote:
> On Monday 17 March 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
> > On Monday 17 March 2008 06:17:33 Laurent Montel wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I fixed and improved kcm autostart module.
> > > Now we can configure autostart desktop file and script.
> > >
> > > I think
Hi,
I've added the emoticons kcm to kdereview some weeks ago, it's very
simple you can add/edit/remove emoticons theme
Carlo
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
17 matches
Mail list logo
