Re: Delaying KDE 4.1 Alpha 1 ?

2008-04-20 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Sunday 20 April 2008, Matt Rogers wrote: > On Sunday 20 April 2008 06:09:22 Tom Albers wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > > > On the agenda for this week is the tagging of Alpha 1. As I understand > > from IRC the fallout from the plasma hacking event is pretty big and the > > current state is less than wh

Re: Delaying KDE 4.1 Alpha 1 ?

2008-04-20 Thread Matt Rogers
On Sunday 20 April 2008 06:09:22 Tom Albers wrote: > Hi Guys, > > On the agenda for this week is the tagging of Alpha 1. As I understand from > IRC the fallout from the plasma hacking event is pretty big and the current > state is less than what we want to display to our alpha testing user base. >

Re: Delaying KDE 4.1 Alpha 1 ?

2008-04-20 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Sunday 20 April 2008, Tom Albers wrote: > Hi Guys, > > On the agenda for this week is the tagging of Alpha 1. As I understand from > IRC the fallout from the plasma hacking event is pretty big and the current > state is less than what we want to display to our alpha testing user base. > > I know

Re: Delaying KDE 4.1 Alpha 1 ?

2008-04-20 Thread Anne-Marie Mahfouf
Le Sunday 20 April 2008 01:09:22 pm Tom Albers, vous avez écrit : > Hi Guys, > > On the agenda for this week is the tagging of Alpha 1. As I understand from > IRC the fallout from the plasma hacking event is pretty big and the current > state is less than what we want to display to our alpha testin

Delaying KDE 4.1 Alpha 1 ?

2008-04-20 Thread Tom Albers
Hi Guys, On the agenda for this week is the tagging of Alpha 1. As I understand from IRC the fallout from the plasma hacking event is pretty big and the current state is less than what we want to display to our alpha testing user base. I know KDE is /a lot/ more than plasma, but I feel the ove