plasma release show stopper apparently fixed

2008-07-09 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
hi all.. it seems that the systray show stopper has been fixed. if we do run into problems post-rc1 with the fix, we'll re-open the bug and inform the release- team. but if you don't hear from us, then no news is good news =) -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0

RC1 tarballs uploaded

2008-07-09 Thread Dirk Mueller
HI, just finished uploading RC1 tarballs from the tag. Not much testing done yet myself. note that kdeplasmoids has been renamed to kdeplasma-addons (new module for 4.1, so we wanted to get the name right before we officially release it). l10n tarballs are on todo, I have to wait for a scri

Re: [Kde-bindings] Status of the kdebindings module?

2008-07-09 Thread Simon Edwards
Richard Dale wrote: > On Wednesday 09 July 2008 11:47:00 Simon Edwards wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> What is the status of the kdebindings modules? Do you guys know of any >> issues which are blocking for the 4.1 RC1 release? The release team >> wants to know. Time to speak up! >> >> I don't have any

Re: 4.2 Schedule.

2008-07-09 Thread Dirk Mueller
On Wednesday 09 July 2008, Tom Albers wrote: > So we are stuck to a large freeze period for ever? What is the thing that you're most concerned about? that a long freeze period causes development to stall, or that it causes development to branch off in work-branches, private repositories, git tr

Re: KDE 4.1 beta2 tarballs (4.0.83) try #1 uploaded

2008-07-09 Thread Allen Winter
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 07:47:43 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Wednesday 09 July 2008, Allen Winter wrote: > > > both sound find to me. Is any of those good enough for being decided upon > > > *today*? > > > > If I had to choose, I'd go for plasma-addons. > > that's fine with me. > > > Honestly, I

Re: KDE 4.1 beta2 tarballs (4.0.83) try #1 uploaded

2008-07-09 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday 09 July 2008, Allen Winter wrote: > > both sound find to me. Is any of those good enough for being decided upon > > *today*? > > If I had to choose, I'd go for plasma-addons. that's fine with me. > Honestly, I think renaming at this point creates a mess that we don't need > to make.

Re: RC1 Delay Request

2008-07-09 Thread Anne-Marie Mahfouf
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 22:03:28 Dirk Mueller wrote: > On Tuesday 08 July 2008, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote: > > yes from me, this is quite a showstopper! > > unrelated, kdeedu is clear to go though? > I think so, I had a thorough test of it the last week of May. As I won't be around for final releas

Re: KDE 4.1 beta2 tarballs (4.0.83) try #1 uploaded

2008-07-09 Thread Allen Winter
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 06:18:41 Dirk Mueller wrote: > On Monday 07 July 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > > > we could also name the module plasma-addons. > > this is actually why i liked plasma-extragear, tbh. descriptive and > > obvious > > also confusing however, because it reuses extragear (

Re: 4.2 Schedule.

2008-07-09 Thread Tom Albers
Op maandag 07 juli 2008 14:46 schreef u: > On Monday 16 June 2008, Sebastian Kuegler wrote: > > > > So, all in all, that would be something like: > > > August - early December: free hacking > > 4 months without a release ? or do you expect 4 months of weekly snapshot > releases to appear? > > >

Re: 4.2 Schedule.

2008-07-09 Thread Dirk Mueller
On Monday 16 June 2008, Sebastian Kuegler wrote: > > So, all in all, that would be something like: > > August - early December: free hacking 4 months without a release ? or do you expect 4 months of weekly snapshot releases to appear? > > ~15 December Release Beta 1 > > ~3 January Release Bet

Phonon release

2008-07-09 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Folks. After talking on #kde-devel and #phonon today asking whether there was a release or at least a snapshot for phonon, Thiago Macieira (thiago) told me to mail you. Can we please have a release for phonon or at least a snapshot? - -- Regards,

Re: Request for breaking hard feature freeze for an important Plasma feature ; )

2008-07-09 Thread Peter Penz
On Tuesday, 1. July 2008 00:26:46 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: [...] > it's really basic code without any real trickinesses to it and would help > with the plasmalash. i'm ok with waiting for 4.2, but i'm not sure our > users are. =P I'm sure most users see this as bug. +1 from my side for fixing this "b

KDE 4.1 branch created

2008-07-09 Thread Dirk Mueller
Hi, No RC1 blockers are aware to me, so I went ahead and created a KDE 4.1 branch from /trunk, which is now heading towards KDE 4.2. Translations for RC1 will be taken from /trunk/l10n-kde4, a separate announcement for translations will follow. I'll have to figure out if its worth keeping KD

Re: KDE 4.1 beta2 tarballs (4.0.83) try #1 uploaded

2008-07-09 Thread Dirk Mueller
On Monday 07 July 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > we could also name the module plasma-addons. > this is actually why i liked plasma-extragear, tbh. descriptive and > obvious also confusing however, because it reuses extragear (which was defined to be seperate from KDE releasese) for a different

Re: RC1 release criteria

2008-07-09 Thread Nicolas Ternisien
Same for kdeadmin, no known blockers . Nicolas On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 8. Juli 2008, um 11:36 Uhr, schrieb Dirk Mueller: >> Hi, >> >> so the time of RC1 tagging has come (tonight/tomorrow). I would like to >> hear comment

Re: RC1 release criteria

2008-07-09 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Dienstag, 8. Juli 2008, um 11:36 Uhr, schrieb Dirk Mueller: > Hi, > > so the time of RC1 tagging has come (tonight/tomorrow). I would like to > hear comments/list of todo items from each module maintainer that would > block RC1. Late, but for the record: No blockers known in kdeutils. Friedric