On Tuesday 14 of June 2011 19:53:39 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Not sure about the other kdegraphics programs but at least for okular it is
> containing something that seems to be okular from 4.6.1 era.
>
> Dirk any idea how that happened?
/me guesses it's because of okular git branch names being
Not sure about the other kdegraphics programs but at least for okular it is
containing something that seems to be okular from 4.6.1 era.
Dirk any idea how that happened?
Albert
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mai
On Thursday, June 9, 2011 18:07:33 Tom Albers wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
> > Weren't you the one proposing that subprojects should adopt their own
> > git
> > workflows? I'm quite puzzled about how problematic this would be.
>
> Since KDE is the community, how can we do a KDE 4.8?
a
On Thursday 09 June 2011 19:28:13 Tom Albers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since it seems some modules are going to have their own numbers and some
> modules will have a different (git) workflow, which will inevitably result
> in different release schedules, I propose we stop producing the central
> release sc
On Friday, June 10, 2011 17:24:57 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
> > In the end, you will be perceived for what you release - and here we get
> > back to this list. KDE lives from being a consistent whole. Eric
> > Hameleers already made some very valid points there. Breaking KDE up
> > does not help, and t
