Hi,
because of all the trouble the moving migration caused so far,
As of now, Dirk had to ask before every release, what he should release
from where.
I thought it might be a good idea to make things more ... written-down.
http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/MovetoGit/Progress
I hope I got the curr
> On Monday 20 June 2011, Manuel Tortosa wrote:
> Well in our case in Chakra we switched our buildsystem already for match
> the new separated tarballs.as in fact. our start was KDEMod, a modular
> KDE set of packages, so the new way is the natural way for us, even
> more monolithic tarballs makes
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Monday 20 June 2011, Manuel Tortosa wrote:
>> El Monday, 20 of June de 2011, a les 22:39:40, Alexander Neundorf va
> escriure:
>> > Or, in other words, I do not yet have any feedback from packagers, except
>> > the early feedback fr
On Monday 20 June 2011, Manuel Tortosa wrote:
> El Monday, 20 of June de 2011, a les 22:39:40, Alexander Neundorf va
escriure:
> > Or, in other words, I do not yet have any feedback from packagers, except
> > the early feedback from Sune in Randa, which is incorporated now, but no
> > fresh feedb
El Monday, 20 of June de 2011, a les 22:39:40, Alexander Neundorf va escriure:
> Or, in other words, I do not yet have any feedback from packagers, except
> the early feedback from Sune in Randa, which is incorporated now, but no
> fresh feedback yet.
Well in our case in Chakra we switched our bu
On Monday 20 June 2011, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Friday 10 June 2011, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > Yes, sure, but I'm away from this noon until Sunday evening.
> > Is this needed already now for 4.7 ?
> >
> > I was hoping to have some more weeks to give it more testing and finish
> > it. ("it" be
A Monday, June 20, 2011, Dirk Mueller va escriure:
> On Friday 17 June 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > with 4.x) or because the newest Okular tag is v4.6.1 in git repo..
>
> okular was taken from svn, simply because thats the way it used to be at
> the beginning when I tagged 4.6.2, and nobod
On 06/20/2011 03:09 PM, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Friday 17 June 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>
>>> with 4.x) or because the newest Okular tag is v4.6.1 in git repo..
>
> okular was taken from svn, simply because thats the way it used to be at the
> beginning when I tagged 4.6.2, and nobody told m
Alle lunedì 20 giugno 2011, Dirk Mueller ha scritto:
> On Friday 17 June 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > with 4.x) or because the newest Okular tag is v4.6.1 in git
> > > repo..
>
> okular was taken from svn, simply because thats the way it used to be
> at the beginning when I tagged 4.6.2, a
On Friday 10 June 2011, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>
> Yes, sure, but I'm away from this noon until Sunday evening.
> Is this needed already now for 4.7 ?
>
> I was hoping to have some more weeks to give it more testing and finish it.
> ("it" being the "Superbuild" CMakeLists.txt, which provide b
On Friday 17 June 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > with 4.x) or because the newest Okular tag is v4.6.1 in git repo..
okular was taken from svn, simply because thats the way it used to be at the
beginning when I tagged 4.6.2, and nobody told me that I should switch to the
git version, so I di
On Tuesday 14 June 2011, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> /me guesses it's because of okular git branch names being inconsistent with
> the rest of kdegraphics (the rest uses KDE/4.x whle Okular goes with 4.x)
> or because the newest Okular tag is v4.6.1 in git repo..
I'm tagging the releaesed tarballs.
On Thursday 16 Jun 2011 13:50:14 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Thursday, June 16, 2011 13:22:10 Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > as I didn't realize that Beta2 was scheduled that soon after Beta1
> > announcement and I was on a longer vacation, how about we skip Beta2 and
> > go with RC1 directly?
> >
> >
13 matches
Mail list logo
