On Sunday 20 January 2013 at 16:11:54, Michael Jansen wrote:
> How about we make all of them happy?
Your patch looks like the correct fix, can we please get this committed?
Kevin Kofler
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://
El Diumenge, 20 de gener de 2013, a les 00:55:35, Kevin Kofler va escriure:
> On Saturday 19 January 2013 at 22:33:19, David Faure wrote:
> > Because this breaks "make install" for developers.
> >
> > (For the recommended case of installing as user rather than as root).
> > The default should make
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 08:37:28 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 January 2013 at 22:33:19, David Faure wrote:
> >> Because this breaks "make install" for developers.
> >>
> >> (For the recommended case of installing as user rat
On Sunday 20 January 2013 11:55:00 David Edmundson wrote:
> > So I did that - result is attached and it doesn't tell me anything except
> > that in the 4.10 cycle significantly less bugs have been created than in
> > the other cycles.
>
> Have you taken into account that the CONFIRMED status change
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Saturday 19 January 2013 19:21:27 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>> > > I think that the 4.11 cycle was not optimal, but I think it is because
>> > > it
>> > > overlapps with Christmas and New Year.
>> >
>> > Why was that suboptimal? We've been ha
On Saturday 19 January 2013 19:21:27 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > > I think that the 4.11 cycle was not optimal, but I think it is because
> > > it
> > > overlapps with Christmas and New Year.
> >
> > Why was that suboptimal? We've been having that since all the 4.x.odd
> > releases
>
> I have the f
