Hi guys, Mario and me have created a tentative schedule for 4.13
We both think that the 4 months schedule has worked pretty well so 4.13 is
basically 4.12 + 4 months but without .4 and .5 because they'd overlap with a
potential 4.14 in August if we keep up doing 4 months.
So to avoid the overla
El Dilluns, 30 de desembre de 2013, a les 12:40:33, David Faure va escriure:
> On Saturday 28 December 2013 17:34:35 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > In any case - yes, these scripts make a lot of sense, we should work on
> > > automating the tagging, and I can help with that.
> >
> > This is the si
El Dilluns, 30 de desembre de 2013, a les 11:26:37, David Faure va escriure:
> On Sunday 29 December 2013 21:09:51 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I think you should create a kf5.0 branch in the repo, that way you can
> > kill
> > the pack_l10n.sh and put the correct branches in the modules.git file,
On Saturday 28 December 2013 17:34:35 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > In any case - yes, these scripts make a lot of sense, we should work on
> > automating the tagging, and I can help with that.
>
> This is the silly script i have, it needs some work to integrate it better
> with the exisitng stuff
On Monday 30 December 2013 21:22:38 you wrote:
> Which repository do you need commit access to?
> sysadmin/release-tools I presume?
Yes.
> A full copy of the XZ compressed tarballs, excluding Oxygen is 800mb
> for an entire SC release.
> Any ideas on what Zip compressed archives would take up in
On Sunday 29 December 2013 21:09:51 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> I think you should create a kf5.0 branch in the repo, that way you can kill
> the pack_l10n.sh and put the correct branches in the modules.git file, etc.
Well there's no l10n in TP1, but I assume there will be in the final KF 5.0
rele
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Diumenge, 29 de desembre de 2013, a les 20:05:20, David Faure va escriure:
>> On Saturday 28 December 2013 17:34:35 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>> > I guess yes, was waiting for Torgny/other people opinion on them, since
>> > they are not
