Re: Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

2014-05-01 Thread Michael Pyne
On Thu, May 1, 2014 21:20:06 Sune Vuorela wrote: > On Wednesday 30 April 2014 21:39:36 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > Especially with all the KF5 bits is versioned bound to each others (so > > > that > > > to fix a bug in one component, you need to update *everything* - > > > > are you assuming t

Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

2014-05-01 Thread Michael Pyne
On Thu, May 1, 2014 11:13:47 Harald Sitter wrote: > On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Michael Pyne wrote: > >> Also ideally, we should break with this tendency of "upstream/downstream" > >> and you should become upstream, I would love to see opensuse (and others) > >> keeping the release you picked

Re: Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

2014-05-01 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Wednesday 30 April 2014 21:39:36 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > Especially with all the KF5 bits is versioned bound to each others (so > > that > > to fix a bug in one component, you need to update *everything* - > > are you assuming that or is this indeed the case ? > Do all frameworks depend o

Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

2014-05-01 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
I think this is so far the more insightful thing I have read so far. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

2014-05-01 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Harald Sitter wrote: > On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Michael Pyne wrote: >>> Also ideally, we should break with this tendency of >>> "upstream/downstream" and you should become upstream, I would love to >>> see opensuse (and others) keeping the release you picked maintained in a >>> branch. >>

Re: Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

2014-05-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On May 1, 2014 4:06:07 AM EDT, Jos Poortvliet wrote: >On Wednesday 30 April 2014 15:36:10 Àlex Fiestas wrote: >> On Wednesday 30 April 2014 08:16:48 Scott Kitterman wrote: >> > I get what you're asking for. >> > >> > What I'm trying to make clear is you aren't going to get it. >> >> Well, I'd s

Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

2014-05-01 Thread Harald Sitter
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Michael Pyne wrote: >> Also ideally, we should break with this tendency of "upstream/downstream" >> and you should become upstream, I would love to see opensuse (and others) >> keeping the release you picked maintained in a branch. > > I think this is wishful thinki

Re: Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

2014-05-01 Thread Jos Poortvliet
On Wednesday 30 April 2014 15:36:10 Àlex Fiestas wrote: > On Wednesday 30 April 2014 08:16:48 Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I get what you're asking for. > > > > What I'm trying to make clear is you aren't going to get it. > > Well, I'd say we try. Isn't there a chance Frameworks 5 WILL be quite r