Hi,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Michael Jansen i...@michael-jansen.bizwrote:
**
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:56:51 PM Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Michael Jansen i...@michael-jansen.biz
wrote:
2. Make the necessary build-system changes
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Michael Jansen i...@michael-jansen.bizwrote:
**
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 08:44:09 PM Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Michael Jansen i...@michael-jansen.biz
wrote:
**
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:56:51
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Michael Jansen i...@michael-jansen.bizwrote:
2. Make the necessary build-system changes to use this version information
for the .SO names.
IMHO this is wrong, the numbers tagged to the end of a shared-object thats
used as a shared library really have
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Manuel Tortosa manutort...@gmail.comwrote:
**
El Diumenge, 10 de juny de 2012, a les 00:52:28, Andreas Pakulat va
escriure:
Ok, great, then please let the kactivities team know about this. The
release-team cannot really do anything about it (other than
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Manuel Tortosa manutort...@gmail.comwrote:
Another issue in the beta2 tarballs, after compiling and installing
kactivities, kde-runtime does not finds it:
Martin Graesslin recently had a nice blog post about some basic information
that needs to be
provided
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Manuel Tortosa manutort...@gmail.comwrote:
Again about SDO
The akonadi-nepomuk feeder needs some commits from a SDO not yet released,
there is a 0.9.5 tagged and also a 0.9.51 but nothing packaged and even
more
the needed commits are after the 0.9.51
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Manuel Tortosa manutort...@gmail.comwrote:
**
El Dissabte, 9 de juny de 2012, a les 19:31:51, Andreas Pakulat va
escriure:
Martin Graesslin recently had a nice blog post about some basic
information that needs to be provided when reporting any kind
On 23.12.11 02:54:00, Kevin Kofler wrote:
2. The released version of KDevelop doesn't build against the new okteta
headers. Not sure whether that's intentional, but it breaks things in any
case. If the incompatibility is intentional, we need an updated KDevelop.
Yes, okteta changed its API and
On 23.12.11 10:55:42, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Friday, December 23, 2011 02:54:00 Kevin Kofler wrote:
2. The released version of KDevelop doesn't build against the new okteta
headers. Not sure whether that's intentional, but it breaks things in any
case. If the incompatibility is
On 23.12.11 10:49:11, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 23.12.11 02:54:00, Kevin Kofler wrote:
2. The released version of KDevelop doesn't build against the new okteta
headers. Not sure whether that's intentional, but it breaks things in any
case. If the incompatibility is intentional, we need
On 10.10.11 00:33:17, Jonathan Callen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/08/2011 06:21 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 08.10.11 15:24:57, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 08.10.11 01:10:50, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
Andras Mantia wrote
On 08.10.11 01:10:50, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
Andras Mantia wrote:
On Sunday, October 02, 2011 17:04:42 Dirk Mueller wrote:
Hi,
I just finished uploading KDE 4.7.2 tarballs. Unlike previous
tarballs, these have been consistently taken from KDE/4.7 branch in
git.
What does this
On 08.10.11 15:24:57, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 08.10.11 01:10:50, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
Andras Mantia wrote:
On Sunday, October 02, 2011 17:04:42 Dirk Mueller wrote:
Hi,
I just finished uploading KDE 4.7.2 tarballs. Unlike previous
tarballs
On 25.11.10 08:40:05, Gilles Caulier wrote:
2010/11/24 Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org:
A Dimecres, 24 de novembre de 2010, Gilles Caulier va escriure:
2010/11/24 Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org:
A Dilluns, 22 de novembre de 2010, Gilles Caulier va escriure:
Hi KDE teams,
This
On 01.10.10 15:32:41, Lubos Lunak wrote:
- WTH does e.g. ksysguard install libraries .so and .h files for something
that looks a lot like its internal libraries?
In case this is about libprocess/libprocessui they are not internal.
They're useful for apps that want to present a widget with a
On 04.08.10 11:16:01, Modestas Vainius wrote:
On antradienis 03 Rugpjūtis 2010 22:52:36 Dirk Mueller wrote:
libkonq is
an edge case, it is used in quite some other modules, on the other side,
due to the anything that depends on *workspace* must require the exact
version anyway, making an
On 04.08.10 19:01:27, Modestas Vainius wrote:
It's probably that the topic is not important or considered as not worth the
extra effort by majority of developers, so I don't expect situation to
improve
greatly despite conclusion on k-c-d.
As I already said, the problem is not that
On 08.07.10 17:36:09, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
Hello
From what I understand, Plasma in KDE4 Workspace 4.5 relies on notifications
provided by libdbusmenu-qt to control what to draw in system tray. And
apparently Qt = Qt-4.6.2 contains known bug that causes 'close application'
On 08.07.10 20:14:47, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
On Thursday 08 of July 2010 19:28:01 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Thursday 8. July 2010 18.42.36 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
The question is: who cares whether Qt minor releases are interchangeable
or not so that we can just specify minimal required
Hi,
I'm pondering where to best put the source tarball for a stable release
for a new app (kdevelop-pg-qt)? Its going to be a stable release, but
I'm unsure about the right place, apps/KDE4.x/utils/ might be a
candiate, but then those subdirs seem to be rarely used..
Where are extragear apps
Hi,
KDevelop4 is approaching its first stable release from extragear and I'm
not fully sure how the procedure is for an extragear app for this.
In particular how does the whole translation-stuff work? Should we have
a kdevelop-i18n.tar.gz or should it be inside the normal
kdevelop.tar.gz? Where
Hi,
I just wrote up the release schedule for KDevelop4.0 and wanted to
include to where we'll branch the release. Unfortunately I can't quite
find the right spot in branches/. So where should a extragear app put
its stable branches?
Andreas
--
You will be reincarnated as a toad; and you will
On 25.02.10 20:50:06, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Dijous, 25 de febrer de 2010, Andreas Pakulat va escriure:
Hi,
I just wrote up the release schedule for KDevelop4.0 and wanted to
include to where we'll branch the release. Unfortunately I can't quite
find the right spot in branches/. So
Hi,
for those interest, we've settled on a final schedule for the 4.0
release of KDevelop4:
http://www.kdevelop.org/mediawiki/index.php/KDevelop_4/4.0_Release_Schedule
Andreas
--
Stay away from hurricanes for a while.
___
release-team mailing list
On 29.11.09 22:41:44, Tom Albers wrote:
Op Sunday 29 November 2009 21:48 schreef u:
I will have no way of fixing any bugs at all in KOrganizer 4.4
until this is dealt with. Basically, we'd be throwing KOrganizer
out there and just hoping for the best. I can't do that as maintainer
of
On 26.11.09 14:53:03, Sebastian Trueg wrote:
I want to apologize for the mess I made in kdelibs yesterday evening. I
can understand that you are frustrated especially with the beta1 tagging.
Let me explain the whole idea of the shared-desktop-ontologies package:
In Nepomuk as in projects
On 30.10.09 22:03:04, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Friday 30 October 2009 19:14:15 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to clarify that we (the KDevelop team) would like to be
part of the KDE 4.4 release. That is we're going to follow the release
schedule as planned on techbase
Hi,
I just wanted to clarify that we (the KDevelop team) would like to be
part of the KDE 4.4 release. That is we're going to follow the release
schedule as planned on techbase and we'd like to be included in the
tarball'ing being done for the beta's and rc's.
I'll be making sure to update the
On 03.08.09 02:32:50, Eike Hein wrote:
Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
it's not a data loss bug, just not a very pretty thing. it also only seems
to
affect the top-left of the scrolled viewport. this is something that would
be
very good to fix in 4.3.1 for sure, but i don't think it's a
On 27.06.09 16:25:39, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I wonder if they really belong there, can someone clarify?
No they don't.
Andreas
--
Today's weirdness is tomorrow's reason why.
-- Hunter S. Thompson
___
release-team mailing list
On 28.06.09 12:39:39, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 27.06.09 16:25:39, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I wonder if they really belong there, can someone clarify?
No they don't.
Was about to say that I've removed them, but apparently that requires a
bit more privileges than I have. Dirk, can you remove
Hi,
it seems that some friendly helpful soul uploaded 0.9.93 tarballs that I
put on upload.kde.org last weekend. At that time they weren't in the
right place and Stephan Binner said I should move them to the
pub/unstable/kdevelop/version place as soon as I got permission for
that. Unfortunately I
On 27.03.09 10:00:53, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Freitag, 27. März 2009 09:26:02 schrieb Dirk Mueller:
The significant change is that oxygen-icons was split out of
kdebase-runtime and is a seperate tarball now. you have to make sure that
you build and install that in addition.
The
On 27.03.09 11:07:50, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Freitag, 27. März 2009 10:52:59 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
Well, trunk/kdesupport is not what you should use for the 4.2 releases.
kdesupport for 4.2 is in /tags/kdesupport-for-4.2/kdesupport and there's no
oxygen-icons there. Hence there should
On 27.03.09 08:16:01, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
On Sexta-feira 27 Março 2009, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Freitag, 27. März 2009 10:52:59 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
Well, trunk/kdesupport is not what you should use for the 4.2 releases.
kdesupport for 4.2 is in /tags/kdesupport-for-4.2
On 27.03.09 12:20:38, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 01:10:30PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Pierre is right, kdebase-runtime tarball is wrong, icons still there.
Well, then move oxygen-icons from tags/KDE/4.2.2 to
branches/kdesupport-for-4.2 as it
belongs
On 27.03.09 14:07:16, Tom Albers wrote:
At Friday 27 March 2009 14:02, you wrote:
Many of the issues would not exists if they communicate with packagers and
dirk *before* take the decision.
Actually, they did. See the archives of the r-t list.
But nobody told Dirk where to get the icons
On 27.03.09 10:05:11, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
On Thursday 26 March 2009 16:00:22 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Thursday 19 March 2009, Cyrille Berger wrote:
I talked with Casper (over irc) on what would be needed for releasing
oxygen icons. Unless I missed something, it's tag, export and
On 28.03.09 01:47:23, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
A Friday 27 March 2009 23:49:32, Sebastian Kügler escreveu:
Some applications still ship some icons on their own (I could give some
examples, like digikam, and used to - koffice). The possible reasons are:
- some application developers don't know
On 28.03.09 01:55:32, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Saturday 28 March 2009 01:27:58 Nuno Pinheiro wrote:
Well my issue is another as nothing to do with the issues so far.
its about control, we are creating a new kde3.x mess couse aplications are
creating their hown versions of the same
On 28.03.09 01:26:26, Nuno Pinheiro wrote:
A Saturday 28 March 2009 00:55:32, Sebastian Kügler escreveu:
In that case, it would make sense to ship it separately. This
change (which is the point of this discussion) is made already. Still,
that's not something we should change in a bug fix
On 21.03.09 18:16:31, Tom Albers wrote:
Op Friday 20 March 2009 13:19 schreef u:
Hi,
In commit 926668 to trunk/KDE/kdepimlibs/kcal/calendarresources.cpp I
accidentally broke binary compatibility.
This commit was back ported to branch 4.2 and is present in KDE4.2.1.
Now I fixed
On 28.01.09 01:28:15, Tom Albers wrote:
Op Wednesday 28 January 2009 01:11 schreef u:
Hi,
as hopefully some of the dot-people read here, or somebody at least knows
where I should turn to: I'd like to have a dot article out with KDevelop's
beta release, but so far were unable to reach
Hi,
seems like our tagged and tarballe'd beta is not going to work very well on
multi-core/multi-processor machines due to parts of kdelibs being
non-threadsafe. We're working on a fix for that.
My problem is: The beta (3.9.90) has already been tagged and tarballe'd and
I'm not sure wether I
Hi,
as hopefully some of the dot-people read here, or somebody at least knows
where I should turn to: I'd like to have a dot article out with KDevelop's
beta release, but so far were unable to reach the authors to coordinate the
whole thing.
The old dot had an email address (dot at kdenews org)
On 09.01.09 13:17:50, Nicolas Lécureuil wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Dirk Mueller muel...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
I just finished uploading the first set of tarballs for RC1 under unstable/
Please let me know if you find any issues, I've not yet started testing
them.
Release
On 09.01.09 17:40:55, Nicolas Lécureuil wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Andreas Pakulat ap...@gmx.de wrote:
On 09.01.09 23:48:24, Funda Wang wrote:
2009/1/9 Andreas Pakulat ap...@gmx.de:
On 09.01.09 13:17:50, Nicolas Lécureuil wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Dirk Mueller
On 07.01.09 17:09:13, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 07.01.09 15:19:03, Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Leaves one question: We wanted to release beta1 with KDE 4.2.0, how do we
best go about this? Do it the same way as done with the beta's, i.e. you
On 07.01.09 23:38:54, Amilcar do Carmo Lucas wrote:
Hi,
Sorry but I had to retag kdevplatform. Are the tar.bz2 files already done ?
If yes, please redo them. I can not because I haven't kde4.2 installed.
+1 from me, please ignore the there's a crash in the tag, so don't package
it mail from
On 20.12.08 18:22:46, Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Friday 19 December 2008 20:21:59 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Hmm, actually isn't this more something for workspace? As far as I
understood the purpose of this is to replace a GTK/Gnome-equivalent if
running a KDE desktop. Thats exactly what workspace
On 19.12.08 10:43:24, Rex Dieter wrote:
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 19.12.08 15:19:54, Matt Williams wrote:
On Friday 19 December 2008 14:41:42 Allen Winter wrote:
Forwarding to the Release Team.
My opinion on this was to defer to those who know the issues
much better than I. IOW: I'm
On 02.12.08 17:27:45, Rafael Fernández López wrote:
Hi,
Why would you want to backport patches to a tag? It's either branch/
(4.1.x) or trunk (next release of that is beta2). Tags are not supposed to
change after a release, which for 4.1.80 a.k.a beta1 has happened :).
Because I want
On 02.11.08 08:29:23, Allen Winter wrote:
Howdy,
Here are the Release Goals for 4.2.
Please send me an update on them: keep; remove; move to 4.3 Goals
Also, please send me any 4.3 Goals that you have.
* KDevelop and KDevplatform modules
^^ late, but will sorta be part of 4.2. right?
On 09.09.08 12:38:25, Martin Schlander wrote:
Tirsdag 09 september 2008 11:28:01 skrev Andreas Pakulat:
On 09.09.08 11:12:08, Martin Schlander wrote:
I would be happy if you would add keeping this page reasonably up to
date, to your list of duties:
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules
Hi,
unfortunately Matt Rogers recently had to step down from the role of
Maintainer/Release Coordinator for the kdevelop and kdevplatform module.
So we (that is the KDevelop developer team) tried to find a new person
for the job. As far as it looks by now (80% of the team acknowledged it)
that
On 26.05.08 13:33:20, Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Friday 23 May 2008, Robby Workman wrote:
Well, unless I'm missing something obvious, kdevelop won't compile
without kdevplatform. Cluestick, anyone? :)
it is supposed to compile without kdevplatform, as only quanta depends on
kdevplatform,
On 06.05.08 17:56:11, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Am Dienstag, 6. Mai 2008, um 17:17 Uhr, schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
On 05.05.08 21:24:52, Andras Mantia wrote:
Actually would be nice to see at least a KDevPlatform release. I know
its hard, but maybe makes sense, just like kdelibs
On 06.05.08 18:22:09, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Am Dienstag, 6. Mai 2008, um 18:15 Uhr, schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
On 06.05.08 17:56:11, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Am Dienstag, 6. Mai 2008, um 17:17 Uhr, schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
On 05.05.08 21:24:52, Andras Mantia wrote
On 06.05.08 19:01:15, Tom Albers wrote:
Op dinsdag 06 mei 2008 18:46 schreef u:
Am Dienstag, 6. Mai 2008, um 18:39 Uhr, schrieb Tom Albers:
Op dinsdag 06 mei 2008 18:30 schreef u:
I disagree. I think it is a must to be BC between minor releases.
If you want to be bic public, go to
On 30.03.08 08:19:33, Allen Winter wrote:
Howdy,
So we seem to have reached consensus on a policy (enclosed below).
Now I think we should take on the task of pre-approving a couple
of non-C++ languages, thereby giving the green light to anyone
thinking about using one of them = Chicken
On 30.03.08 17:35:54, Simon Edwards wrote:
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 30.03.08 08:19:33, Allen Winter wrote:
I'm not a kdebindings person, but I did try both korundum (ruby) and
I know PyQt/PyKDE for quite some time.
Both have one drawback:
- PyQt/PyKDE are both mostly developed
On 28.03.08 09:41:28, Nicolas Ternisien wrote:
Here is one of the main problems: those apps will work only if you have
their bindings installed. But the bindings need to be generated whenever
something changes in the libraries, so you might end up with a none-
working app in a main
Hi,
IIRC for KDE 3.5 there was an xml file to accumulate the various
changes (specially features) that were done. Does something like that
exist for KDE 4.1 too? I mean besides the feature planning page on
techbase. Where do I find it if it exists? I'd like to add an entry for
the Print
On 21.03.08 13:46:24, David Faure wrote:
On Friday 21 March 2008, Andras Mantia wrote:
without hunting on project pages for the latest release that works with
a specific KDE version.
Does this mean that those libs in kdesupport are making incompatible changes
!??
Sorry, I didn't
On 21.03.08 16:43:16, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Divendres 21 Març 2008, Andreas Pakulat va escriure:
On 21.03.08 13:46:24, David Faure wrote:
On Friday 21 March 2008, Andras Mantia wrote:
without hunting on project pages for the latest release that works with
a specific KDE version
On 14.12.07 15:49:24, Cyrille Berger wrote:
On Friday 14 December 2007, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Are you sure about that? I don't know how SuSE or RedHat and others do
their releases but I'd expect them to need at least 2 or rather 4 weeks
after a KDE 4.1 release until its patched up/fixed
On 13.12.07 07:10:20, Matt Rogers wrote:
On Dec 13, 2007, at 5:53 AM, John Tapsell wrote:
+1 vote for not including and having a 4.1 release within 3-4 months
of 4.0. I think everyone can be satisfied with that.
I'm not. :P You get basically two months to develop and add new
features
On 10.12.07 18:13:20, Allen Winter wrote:
On Monday 10 December 2007 18:04:16 Kevin Kofler wrote:
In Bug 153463 [1], Kevin Kofler provides some patches to make the current
Kompare code in kdesk compile (and work, I guess).
It definitely works here, at the very least. :-)
Kevin,
On 08.12.07 23:12:16, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
_knumfloat::_knumfloat(QString const num)
{
mpf_init(_mpf);
mpf_set_str(_mpf, num.toAscii(), 10);
}
I already tried to pass 10,0 without success. Don't know if nan and
inf is correctly interpreted.
Does gmp create a deep copy of the
On 28.11.07 07:30:29, Rex Dieter wrote:
Andras Mantia wrote:
On Wednesday 28 November 2007, Rex Dieter wrote:
If this is absolutely the last slip, sure. Otherwise, the release
party scheduled for January 17 will look pretty silly.
But doing a release just for the shake of the release
On 28.11.07 15:29:26, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
[CC:ing ev-marketing anyway.]
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 15:08:50 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 28.11.07 07:30:29, Rex Dieter wrote:
Andras Mantia wrote:
On Wednesday 28 November 2007, Rex Dieter wrote:
If this is absolutely the last
Hi,
I'd like to add a new showstopper to the 4.0 release goals. lskat from
kdegames is completely unusable since revision 731909. The graphics
drawing code was changed to center the cards, but the code that finds
the right positions for clicks is still the old. Also the drawing of the
covered
On 28.11.07 18:56:57, Thomas Zander wrote:
On Wednesday 28. November 2007 18:37:13 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
I'd like to add a new showstopper to the 4.0 release goals. lskat from
kdegames is completely unusable since revision 731909.
Can you revert the bad change?
I could, but I'm
On 28.11.07 12:56:32, Rex Dieter wrote:
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 28.11.07 12:13:44, Rex Dieter wrote:
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
I'd like to add a new showstopper to the 4.0 release goals. lskat from
kdegames is completely unusable since revision 731909.
Maybe I'm dense or naive
On 16.11.07 15:28:46, Thomas Zander wrote:
Hi,
I have been running KDE4 as my main desktop for the last couple of days and
plasma is shaping up nicely; lots of thingies missing but I sure people are
aware of that.
What I have not seen any emails about is that status of kwin.
I really
On 13.11.07 17:59:09, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Allen Winter wrote:
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 12:33:45 pm Tom Albers wrote:
Op Tuesday 13 November 2007 16:52 schreef u:
Reading back on the beta5 or rc1 thread it seems like most people
are for keeping to
On 12.11.07 12:22:11, Thomas Zander wrote:
Hi Torsten,
On Monday 12. November 2007 08:25:18 Torsten Rahn wrote:
while
we do have some pretty minor showstoppers.
Well, last time I checked the default style didn't support QToolBox yet.
This basically rendered Marble unusable as
On 12.11.07 13:48:19, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Monday 12 November 2007 13:01:42 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Did we make oxygen (the style) a showstopper? I thought we'd look at the
quality when nearing a release and just ship with plastique as default if
oxygen was not good enough
On 12.11.07 14:28:42, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Monday 12 November 2007 14:08:17 Thomas Zander wrote:
On Monday 12. November 2007 13:48:19 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
That's really 'only' two showstoppers left,
I think the point is that Torsten noted that QToolBox is not supported.
On 01.10.07 09:40:57, Tom Albers wrote:
At Monday 01 October 2007 02:17, you wrote:
We recently moved to a branch (please no flames anymore, got enough of
that already) and some of us developers would like to merge that branch
back into KDE/3.5 before this release. The thing is, that
On 01.10.07 06:30:25, Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Saturday, 8. September 2007, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
5) Should language bindings be part of the development platform?
Richard Dale says Python and Ruby in good shape by late October, and
possibly C# too.
If Richard says he can do it, i
On 21.09.07 10:02:43, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi!
It's been a while since KDE 3.5.7 (released may 22nd) and a lot has changed
in the 3.5 branch since then, so I would like to release another service pack.
As the translators requested some clean up time, I suggest we go with October
7th as
On 23.09.07 18:19:40, Matt Rogers wrote:
On Sunday 23 September 2007 15:12:20 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 23.09.07 14:26:04, Troy Unrau wrote:
Hey guys, perhaps this should go on your list at
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.0_Release_Beta_Goals
KWin Composite has performance
On 23.09.07 14:26:04, Troy Unrau wrote:
Hey guys, perhaps this should go on your list at
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.0_Release_Beta_Goals
KWin Composite has performance issues (big ones) on hardware where
other 3D compositing programs run perfectly smoothly. Perhaps we just
SVN commit 713402 by apaku:
Change the path for stable kdevelop, its now in a separate branch to allow
ongoing development for the kdevelop3 series.
CCMAIL:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCMAIL:release-team@kde.org
CCMAIL:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M +4 -1 get_paths
---
On 02.09.07 17:44:25, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
On Sunday 02 September 2007, Allen Winter wrote:
Ok, I turned the Krazy web site off.
I can't really do anything about the command line tool
except tell folks not to use it.
-Allen
Please, no.
I was planning to use it in a
On 22.05.07 19:15:20, Tom Albers wrote:
Op di 22 mei 2007 17:57 schreef u:
Other point, it was said that the agressive 4.0 release schedule was also to
allow devs to developp and port applications for 4.x. What is the purpose
without kdevelop and win/osx port?
I would love a win/osx port
87 matches
Mail list logo
